Police are investigating a virtual sexual assault of a girl’s avatar, the chair of the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners has said.

Donna Jones said she had learned that a complaint was made in 2023, triggering a police inquiry.

The virtual incident did not result in physical harm but caused “psychological trauma”, the Daily Mail has reported a source as saying. Police chiefs have called on platforms to do more to protect their users.

The impact of the attack on the girl’s avatar was said to be heightened because of the immersive nature of the VR experience.

  • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe when an article says “The daily mail jas reported” we should completely ignore it until a better paper reports on it. Everything coming from the daily mail should be considered a lie.

  • whaleross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    It sounds ridiculous that they assaulted an avatar. I think it is the wrong take. The avatar is just the medium. The target was obviously the person behind the avatar. It’s like saying that threats over text message is assaulting her phone.

    • DreamButt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ssssh it’s okay iphone. Don’t listen to them. I know you were just protecting me from the bullies in high school

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is sexual harrassment, not assault. It’s still disgusting, but there’s no reasonable expectation of harm. They can always take off the headset.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      And yet it’s completely possible to kill someone with cyber bullying. Trauma is trauma.

    • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s entirely reasonable that a panicking and scared child might forget they can escape by removing their headset, or experience enough to end up traumatised before they’ve got it off - if they don’t log out, too, they’ll know people are still there doing things to a representation of themselves. There’s still harm, even if the exact nature of the harm is different.

    • LUHG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it got that good vr would be in every household. Can’t wait to get a strangers finger up the bum.

    • Candelestine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not objective, it’s subjective. 100% of “immersion” is happening in your brain, where the signals received by your senses are being processed into experiences. Thus, different people will experience different levels of immersion, which is how things should be, instead of everyone being expected to try to feel the same as everyone else when faced with the same stimuli.

      Basically you’re expressing an opinion. Which is fine, people can have those, but others can have other ones too. And that is also fine.

      • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I mean is there’s nothing pushing or pulling at you, you can clip your hand into the other person (or mush it to a point where it’s visually disconnected from where your arm is), you can easily remove yourself from the situation by logging off, taking the headset off, or both.

        • Candelestine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s fair. I can see a state of panic potentially being involved, but that could be addressed with technical improvements. Monitoring your eyeballs perhaps, and some sort of panic safety switch.

  • Chaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The amount of murder I have done in gaming. I’m going away for a long time boys💀

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    the Daily Mail

    Ah yes so file this under shit that never happened.

    Assaulting someone in a VR game is still assault especially if they never consented.

    • Zeon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      ‘Assaulting someone in a VR game is still assault especially if they never consented.’

      Sarcasm?

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s wait for the feel suits to arrive before equating virtual “crimes” to real ones, especially in a medium where you can just block anyone, at most this should go in the same place a death threat via text goes for now.

    • chitak166@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Eh, I’d say death threats should be followed up on.

      ‘Virtual sexual harassment’ should be followed up on if it involves threats of real crimes.

      Saying, “I’m gonna come to your house and rape you” is definitely cause for criminal investigation, if there’s enough evidence to make it viable.

      Saying, “you like that, don’t you?” while “fondling” an avatar in VR is not cause for criminal investigation.

  • Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a joke.

    Real crimes are being compared to vr “crimes”. Next will be thought crimes.

  • Dr. Coomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The fact that this is even compared to real SA is so fucked up. At least on the internet or game you can leave, it’s not like your forced to endure the actions or behavior of other people.

  • trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Are you fucking kidding me?

    They took cops off of real cases to work a VIRTUAL ASSAULT in a video game. (just harassment, not assault btw)

    JFC I hope we fucking get nuked soon. We don’t deserve to live.

  • KeefChief13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just feel like this would set a negative precedent for interactions in online games. Idk tho, not a lawyer.