China launches test runs for world’s largest plant that can convert coal to ethanol::undefined

    • Oderus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      China has ghost cities with empty apartment buildings. They have tons of resources to waste.

      • dmonzel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        46
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Tell me you’re living half a decade in the past without telling me. “Ghost cities” are actually areas where the state preplanned urbanization so everything would be in place when people started moving in. In fact, most of these “ghost cities” are actually populated now.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Under-occupied_developments_in_China

        Edit: could someone please explain why I’m being downvoted? I’ve provided a source to back up my statements. Or is this a case of “everything about China is bad because Red Scare”?

        • falkerie71@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s another side to this. “Pre-planning” without proper forecast led to the housing crisis we are seeing today in China, with one of the largest developers in China Evergrande defaulting and filing for bankruptcy. A lot of people who were promised a good property and sunk their life savings into the project, now have no choice but to live in unfinished buildings in ghost towns without electricity nor water.

          https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2023/10/31/crumbling-buildings-and-broken-dreams-chinas-unfinished-homes
          https://www.reuters.com/markets/asia/china-home-buyers-occupy-their-rotting-unfinished-properties-2022-09-26/

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I haven’t got into the article that much but sure, nothing is perfect.

            Is it better to not even try and pretend its acceptable for people to be homeless, like they do almost everywhere else?

            • falkerie71@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              They’re not building apartments to give out to homeless people for free here. People actually had to pay for those properties and were scammed.

                  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    i have the feeling im the one talking to a brick wall.

                    would you rather pay rent to a banker for the rest of your life? flooding the market is a sound strategy to make cheap housing.

        • Oderus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I stated a fact and you bent over backwards trying to prove anyone who agreed with me was wrong.

          Ghost cities are real. It wasn’t a ‘everything about China is bad’ comment like you whined so that’s why you’re getting downvoted.

          Why get all defensive anyway? Is someone paying you to defend China from any criticism? You come across like you’re simping for China.

          Do you get upset when people talk about winnie the poo?

          • 4am@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Defensive like downvoting facts?

            Yeah some urban preplanning didn’t work out but most of those cities are filled up to the point of working now.

            I remember back then all those articles - “China is building empty cities! Ha ha so dumb! Who’s gonna buy that, they all work in factories!”

            It’s pretty striking that an .ml user posted a comment defending a verifiable fact, and got 10 downvotes for being “uppity”. Oh, sorry for the Wikipedia link sir, I will think more about respect for all powerful America next time

            You guys really need to clean out your brainworms sometime, this shit is embarrassing

            • Oderus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I said ghost cities exist, and then you said they didn’t. That’s being defensive and then you went after other people who provided facts and you just got more defensive… and here you are now, being defensive. Do you know what being defensive means?

              I don’t give 2 shits who downvotes you or why. Grow thicker skin if you can’t handle the internet son.

        • wikibot@lemmy.worldB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Here’s the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

          Under-occupied developments in China were mostly unoccupied property developments in China, and frequently referred to as "ghost cities" or ghost towns. The phenomenon was observed and recorded as early as 2006 by writer Wade Shepard, and subsequently reported by news media over the decades. Although a feature of discourse on the Chinese economy and urbanization in China in the 2010s, formerly under-occupied developments have largely filled up.

          article | about

          • cyruseuros@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not weighing in on either side of the discussion, but that’s a video that’s almost completely unrelated to the topic above.

            It speaks to how overleveraged/poorly managed a lot of Chinese development was, leading to a borderline colapse of the construction industry, and largely leaves the subject of ghost cities unaddressed.

            • Jin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Chinese projects / developments are short-sighted. It’s a Ponzi scheme, Get money from new investors, pay existing clients. So just keep building.

              They become ghost cities because building are not fully done for living, so people can’t even move in. The Infrastructure is incomplete like no proper transportation links, no jobs, no shops etc. there is literally nothing there.

              • cyruseuros@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ok, now I get the link you’re trying to make, but it doesn’t fully adress my question.

                The one thing that’s still leaving me prickly is simply saying Wikipedia is wrong because it’s editable by anyone. That’s like saying FOSS is insecure because it’s editable by anyone. Neither the conclusion nor the premise is correct in either case. There are hierarchies & access controls in both that often yield better results than the traditional alternative.

                Wikipedia is a treasure, and while it is still vulnerable to brigading (far more so than FOSS), this is far from the norm (especially nowadays) and should be backed up with specific sources and rectified.

                While I do agree with you that Wikipedia shouldn’t be cited directly due to this vulnerability, it acts as an excellent contextual citation aggregator, and quite frankly I’ve often found it more up-to-date and less biased than some of the crap that made it past the peer review process in my college days.

                For instance, if what you’re saying is true (shortsightedness), people may over the years still populate those areas (the claim of the Wikipedia article is that a lot/most of the ghost cities did). If you have sources stating otherwise, please report the article for manipulation and include them there. If you don’t feel like it, post them here and I will do so, despite knowing absolutely nothing about Chinese ghost cities, because I believe this is important.

                Please don’t dismiss such a shining example of human collective action so lightly. It’s one of the few things that makes me believe there’s still some good left in the world.

          • dmonzel@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Wikipedia sources are fairly old

            A few of the sources are literally from 2023. But do go on, it certainly seems like you’re here in good faith, right?

            • Jin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yeah, I’m not saying there isn’t anything newer “A few” vs what’s up to date

              Wikipedia isn’t great place for sources because everyone can post and edit. We taught in school never to source Wikipedia for that reason.

              Wikipedia banned seven users after reported ‘infiltration’ by a Chinese group https://www.engadget.com/wikipedia-banned-seven-users-after-reported-infiltration-by-a-chinese-group-104143971.html?

              China and Taiwan clash over Wikipedia edits https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-49921173

              I’m here in good faith 🙏

              • dmonzel@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Wikipedia isn’t great place for sources because everyone can post and edit.

                Then you can check the sources listed in the article. You’re not just supposed to take Wikipedia’s word for it, but you are allowed to click on the links in the references section. So either you’re not aware of this, or you’re not making this argument in good faith. In either event, because looking at the several sources in the wiki article I provided seems like it’s still not good enough for you, I get the feeling this conversation is going nowhere.

                • Jin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, we should stop because you are not getting what I’m saying and probably can’t see why you being downvoted.

                  Cheers

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s the attitude we don’t appreciate.

          Also, you’re on the back foot to start with on a .ml account.