"Like so many applications of AI, this new power is likely to be a double-edged sword: It may help people identify the locations of old snapshots from relatives, or allow field biologists to conduct rapid surveys of entire regions for invasive plant species, to name but a few of many likely beneficial applications.
“But it also could be used to expose information about individuals that they never intended to share, says Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst at the American Civil Liberties Union who studies technology. Stanley worries that similar technology, which he feels will almost certainly become widely available, could be used for government surveillance, corporate tracking or even stalking.”
Yes, and people like me having continued to point out that this problem stems from a bad view of expectation of privacy.
A non-famous person has a reasonable expectation of privacy on public property. If you take a photo and a non-famous person’s face is in it, you should have written consent for only that photo or blur it out. If Disney can own an image of a mouse for 95 fucking years I can own my own image.
Don’t take pictures of people or their property without consent. Just because technology allows you to be a disgusting creep doesn’t mean you should. If you want jerk off material just use the internet like the rest of us.