I’ve just finished reading the last of the books, and I’m pretty excited to see what they do with the series.

  • Stoney_Logica1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Already, there’s been some controversy surrounding the casting of Skarsgård, a cis man, as Murderbot, an android with no sexual characteristics (because, in Murderbot’s words, why would it need them, it’s not a sex bot).”

    I really hope this is a joke that’s going over my head. Was the casting department supposed to rely on the wide pool of openly asexual actors?

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      In one of the other discussions here, there were a number of people who pictured Murderbot as female, a number male, and some who truly pictured it genderless. For the people who pictured it female, I’m sure a male actor doesn’t sit right. To me, casting seems difficult because it’s supposed to be somewhat physically imposing, shouldn’t have obvious breasts, but also shouldn’t be overtly masculine. I’ll be curious to see what they do with the actor.

      • dexa_scantron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a tough role to cast, since the books never describe what Murderbot looks like at all, beyond “has a face” and “has short hair but no body hair” and “some organic parts on arms but not on legs”. And Murderbot can pass as human if someone doesn’t know what SecUnits look like. No indication of height, build, complexion, features, nothing. So anyone they cast is going to look wrong to a bunch of readers because their mental pictures can vary so widely.

        Mine is somewhere between Gwendolyn Christie and Robocop. But I like Alexander Skarsgard and I’ll definitely watch this. He has a good “I am 100% done with everyone’s nonsense” expression, which is vital.

        • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          He has a good “I am 100% done with everyone’s

          nonsense” expression, which is vital. Honestly, that’s the key quality for me: someone who can pull off the social anxiety and the disgust with humans while also clearly caring for at least some of them.

  • dexa_scantron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article said 3 times that Murderbot is an android; Murderbot is not an android, it’s a cyborg or construct (with both organic and inorganic parts). Geez.

  • tyrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder how they will get the inner monologue and communication between systems on screen. Murderbot talking about his stories or how stupid humans are is the best part

    • Omnificer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      My guess would be narration by Murderbot’s actor for the inner monologue.

      The systems communication might partially be handled like how most things handle text messages, with the word bubbles.

      I wonder if they’ll commit to hiding the actor’s face most of the time.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe they’ll do a Dune and have the characters whisper to themselves half the time.

      • mayotte2048@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That brings up a really good point. A lot of the story is Murderbot describing how they are hacking this or that. It could be really tricky handling that on tv in a way that is entertaining.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So this is being developed by the people responsible for - variously - The Creator, American Pie, and Foundation?

    Not exactly inspiring huge confidence in their ability to create thoughtful science fiction that respects and understands the core themes of the source material.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve read the Murderbot books and enjoyed them, but I wouldn’t call them deep.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but Foundation isn’t exactly deeply layered either. It expresses its themes (theme, really) very directly. And despite that Goyer still managed to adapt a series of books about how no one person really influences history in meaningful ways, it’s the power of social movements that matters, into a TV show about how the whole of history can turn on the actions of one person in the right place at the right time. There’s “trashy” and then there’s “Managing to somehow miss the core theme of a book where characters frequently turn to the audience and literally state the core theme outright.”

      • mayotte2048@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The mental health journey of murderbot is pretty subtle. That would be a pretty easy thing to screw-up.