• gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    419
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well shucks, all they did was drive out their most active content makers and cut themselves off from hundreds of thousands of dollars in free moderation labor. Who could possibly have seen this coming?

    • eek2121@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was one of the reasons they killed the api: to support ad growth. Unfortunately they failed to realize the combination of ad-blocking browsers and users just quitting the site from losing client access means they were never going to hit pre-IPO revenue targets.

      Had they instead focused on affordable API pricing and driving subscriber revenues up, they would have exceeded revenue targets.

      source: I was in a somewhat similar position (not quite the same, no third party client), but chose different and found myself making more subscription revenue than ad revenue thanks to a viewer base more than happy to pay more.