• persolb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Credit where it is due though… they could have remained silent and probably taken no flak… so good on them.

    Their big request seems to be to make sure people are aware when a phone is fixed with off-brand parts. This also makes sense to me. Some portion of off brand parts will cause problems, which may show up as complaints back to or about Apple.

    (An example: we have a system trained to map rail territory using head-end video using some visual odometery and 2010-era AI. A specific client has cameras that we can’t process well because of weird subtle artifacts. Apple is doing much more complicated stuff than we are.)

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Talk is cheap. They get flak for their actions, what here has changed.

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Any pre-owned device is going to inherently be less valuable than a brand new device. Phones are sharply depreciating assets.

      What apple doesn’t seem to want is to recycle components from otherwise unusable devices into damaged devices . They want repair shops to have to buy parts directly from apple, so they can maintain control of the market.