Suspects can refuse to provide phone passcodes to police, court rules::Phone-unlocking case law is “total mess,” may be ripe for Supreme Court review.

  • logicbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is a complicated situation, but in my opinion, probably the correct decision.

    Given this is the ruling, if you do believe your phone is about to be confiscated, and you don’t want its contents to be used as evidence, it might be a good idea to turn off your phone. Although the police cannot compel a password, a biometric unlock is not a password. If you turn off your phone, it will generally require a password to enable biometric unlock.

    • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not complicated at all. The constitution guarantees the right that no one be compelled to testify against themselves.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most phones have a way to use a button sequence force the next lock to require a PIN code. iPhone is just hitting the side button 5x for instance.