SpaceX blasts FCC as it refuses to reinstate Starlink’s $886 million grant::FCC doubts ability to provide high-speed, low-latency service in all grant areas.

  • Marcbmann@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    After 5 years.

    SpaceX sells services. Just because they’re selling services to the government doesn’t make it a subsidy.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Starlink is a service sold to you, not the American government. You seem confused. You don’t get it for free paid for by taxes.

      You have to buy it, and the American government subsidies it to encourage private sector spending on low to no profit endeavours like Internet to remote regions

      • Marcbmann@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        SpaceX has paid for starlink through selling flights on their rockets, not through “subsidies like this”

        You seem confused if you’re flip flopping between starlink being paid for by consumers and subsidies.

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, they didn’t. They got almost a billion a year in subsidies, which is what this whole thread is about.

          Starlink is paid for by consumers and heavily subsidized by governments. It’s not that hard to follow.