• SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I listened to his audiobook before I knew who he was. I just kept thinking to myself “this guy seems like an out of touch fuckwit.” I couldn’t help but disagree with so much of what he said to the point that I lost any desire to acquire any wealth. I figured I’d rather die poor in a ditch than become anything like this human leech. I’m still a bit dirty that I gave him a couple of dollars for his book but at least I know what I don’t want to be so that’s something I guess

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like the purported capitalism that’s run rampant for centuries is just an extension and rebranding of the OG feudalism. Always thought that.

      • alekwithak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Very true, been touting this for years. The rich tricked the peasantry into helping them take over the aristocracy. Now we have less legal protections than a medieval serf.

      • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Basically. The original bourgeois fighting against the feudal lords basically changed just enough so that they themselves could become lords, or lord like, with no so much care for anyone below thier own class.

      • Cowbee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are significant differences, but yes, in a way. Class conflict has always been at the core of modern human history, and when the bourgeoisie and Proletariat teamed up against the Aristocracy, Capital was transfered from the hands of the microscopically few to the hands of much more. However, this is an incomplete transfer of power, and as Capital consolidates, it trends back to a form of Feudalism.

        • blazeknave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, well put. I’m just identifying the underlying class conflict of resource scarcity and power hunger, through all of human history under the guise of any and every governmental system

          Very concisely written dude… really nails the way the shifting about happened

        • blazeknave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I had a history teacher in the late 90s that lapped up every paper I wrote bc within the boundaries of the assignment, I’d be writing about Che instead of Teddy Roosevelt.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or…perhaps…instead of 100-year mortgages we learn from the French and start separating heads and wealth from the 1% that are trying to own everything so they can rent it to us.

      • ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes.

        It’s a rip from cassette days when there were dire warnings of “Home taping is killing music. And it’s illegal”. There were some concerns about home sewing doing the same thing but even the doom sayers knew it was kind of lame to make too big a stink about. Now it’s more a call to arms to diy.

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m going to sit down with Mom and get a refresher course on sewing. I can make simple stuff.

    I have made clothing patterns in Autocad and printed them out on a plotter before. Going to pirate some pants.

  • chitak166@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I keep saying this, companies want a lifeline to your wallets.

    But nobody wants to listen.

    • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, they do. They will then increase the punishment saying it’s to discourage more (proven not to work) so they can arrest people for long periods and have their legal slave labor.

  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    they United States Federal government holds the note on my house. I’m paying 1% interest. for 33 years.

    it’s a pretty sweet deal.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Wish I would have. At 52, I’d have been retired for 20 years, pulling retirement since then, and fat on benefits. PLUS, working as a government consultant of some sort if I was skilled and chose to do so.

          And somehow, people think if you join, you have to pick up an M4 and go fight in a desert. Yeah, those jobs are for people who want them, or are too stupid to do anything else.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        USDA direct loan. the rates went up this year but they still give a deferment for financial hardship. I think it’s called a 502 or 503 direct loan.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I got a Habitat for Humanity house and mortgage. 0% interest, 0 property taxes. Cost of the home was the cost of purchasing the land and building it.

      Keep playing sucker games kids, keep getting suckered, keep bitching.

      Or maybe try something?

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is like the 3 article I’ve seen of this douche in the past two weeks spouting off his feudalistic horseshit. This dude wants so bad to be a lord over his minions.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    says we might even rent out clothes

    With today’s fast fashion churning out clothes with shorter and shorter lifespans combined with our cultural love of replacement over repair, we basically already do.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The thing is, if everyone rents homes, then there will be a ton of political pressure to fix pricing. Of course the system is so broken that there’s no guarantee of real change, but it could happen.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re assuming people won’t vote directly against their interests. This is America lol

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s why I hedged a lot, because people do all sorts of things, and the status is not quo.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      A majority of people should always be renters, and homes should lose value over time if not rehabbed. Until both of those boxes are checked, housing prices will continue to rise.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why should a majority of people be renters?

        Prices are high because of hoarding by land barons and corps while we simply don’t build enough in my opinion.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If not renters, condo (or something like it) owners. We need to build for density and disincentivize house ownership, because demand exceeds supply by such margins that we are unlikely to resolve it any time in the next generation of we only build houses - plus we are contributing to sprawl and the associated externalities.

          LA is a warning, not an ideal.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What a load of crap. “if these data points I cherry picked hold to this trend in a straight line forever” blah, blah, blah. By the way, buy my book