• Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s really efficient in densely populated areas but inefficient in sparsely populated areas.

      While it should be everywhere eventually , the focus should definitely be on cities first.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The last miles are a huge problem in villages. Train stops and you then walk 5 miles every time? The bus needs to ride every 30 minutes to bring along 5 people that’s super expensive.

          Also everyone there already has a car anyways since it’s basically required there.

          Cities however can use public transport far more efficiently.

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            you do realize trains are part of the public transport and no reasonable person would think you can’t take a car to the train station?

            what do you think I am talking about? a bus going every 30 minutes to every house in bumfuck nowhere on the off chance they get a passenger?

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes but then you already have the car.

              And if you already have the car then that’s usually far more practical than public transport.

              Public transport works well in cities because it can completely eliminate the need for someone to own a car.