The Biden administration on Thursday asserted its authority to seize the patents of certain costly medications in a new push to slash high drug prices and promote more pharmaceutical competition.

The administration unveiled a framework outlining the factors federal agencies should consider in deciding whether to use a controversial policy, known as march-in rights, to break the patents of drugs that were developed with federal funds but are not widely accessible to the public. For the first time, officials can now factor in a medication’s price — a change that could have big implications for drugmakers depending on how the government uses the powers.

“When drug companies won’t sell taxpayer-funded drugs at reasonable prices, we will be prepared to allow other companies to provide those drugs for less,” White House National Economic Advisor Lael Brainard said during a call with reporters Wednesday.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    203
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m probably going to get downvoted for this, but the Biden administration has really exceeded my expectations.

    • Brokkr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      They do great work, but they don’t market and promote their successes well enough. I would prefer a society that favors humility more and therefore appreciate this administration’s style, but it seems that a lack of hubris is now considered a fault in the public eye, on both sides of the aisle.

        • frunch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          2 years ago

          American citizens slammed with lower drug and education costs

          –there, now the media can run with it lol

          • Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            SLAM! As an American I demand more slams! Slam everything! Slam Trump! Slam Biden! Slam medicare! Slam insurance policies! Slam portmanteaus! Slam Bidenomics! Slam Obama care!

            SLLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMM!!!

      • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I would like an administration whose flamboyant about their successes so I know what to expect in my daily life when it comes to politics aka why I see more EVs (rebates funding and a federal charging grid), lower/higher prices on things (like Biden removing patents to create competition) and even insurrectionists going to jail (if we had a working justice system)!

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      No, I feel the same way. It’s just that they’ve also utterly sucked in some areas too. Regardless, you know I’m hella voting for him because wtf else am I gonna do? There’s no choice in our political system so I’ll do what I need to.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      No disagreements here. I am kind of shocked by this very non neolib behavior—the above as well as well as being the first sitting president to join the UAW picket line. I was a bit miffed about the train strike, though. But his administration lobbied the companies and got them their sick days they’ve been fighting for, for ages. Really didn’t expect any of that.

      • RainfallSonata@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 years ago

        Non neolib? Introducing competition rather than seizing and making them public is about as neolib as you can get.

        • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          So by letting a company keep their monopoly due to federally subsidized patent thus harming citizens but helping the company is… less neolib?

          Whatever it is, it seems shittier than making a move to fuck a company – if it results in reduced drug prices anyway.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            So by letting a company keep their monopoly due to federally subsidized patent thus harming citizens but helping the company is… less neolib?

            Yes. Monopolization is one of the many externalities that government exists to address within a neoliberal framework

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              It’s only controversial if your only understanding of economic orthodoxy is Breadtube or some shit lol

    • silverbax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Every time there’s a bunch of commenters talking about how little they like Biden (or his administration) for ‘not doing enough’, I know:

      • that person almost certainly does not actually vote
      • that person does not pay attention to politics, they just repeat what they’ve seen on social media, which is their own echo chamber.

      How do I know they don’t vote? Because they are too lazy to even be up to date via Google on the political opinions they post - they certainly aren’t going to bother to actually leave their house and vote.

      That said, the Biden administration might do well to be more bombastic with their statements about their successes. I don’t love the idea that the merit of a success would need to be ‘sold’, but you have the GOP screaming idiot things all over the media sphere every single day, and that has to be competed with.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The only point of disagreement I have is that it’s been demonstrated that the Internet doesn’t promote echo chambers, it does quite the opposite in fact.

        The problem it introduces is that people are constantly exposed against their will to opposing viewpoints curated to make them as angry as possible.

        This results in them becoming explosively volatile towards those opposing viewpoints even in moderated or even well justified forms because they have learned to associate any opposing opinions with the algorithm selected ultra aggro version they just had a knock down drag out hundred comment chain argument with someone a day ago.

        IRL you just disregard the fucker and move on, the internet is teaching people to see everyone who disagrees with you as that fucker laying in wait to instigate yet another knock down drag out argument where you feel like you’re losing your mind talking to a wall that insists the sky is orange and that climate policy is communism because soylent green burgers or whatever.

        Then there’s the additional problem of when a significant portion of the people trying to sound reasonable on the internet turn out to actually be that fucker out to instigate because they want to make you look crazy for how mad you get at their bullshit while they calmly explain that “it isn’t unreasonable to expect a politician to earn your vote!”

        It’s rhetorical strategies within rhetorical strategies all designed to keep you under a constant feeling of being attacked.

    • Cheems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s what I keep saying. Despite the bar being extremely low due to the previous administration and the whole “nothing fundamentally will change” my expectations have definitely been exceeded

          • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            We don’t need a Fox “news” equivalent for Democrats that pumps out propaganda (your term used above) and traps Democrats into an echo chamber.

            I mean we already have some fairly biased left leaning news outlets. Nothing like Fox or OANN or Breitbart.

            Still, I would like to get rid of heavily biased propaganda outlets because – yes – they basically brainwash their listers with various techniques.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        They do, it’s just that that ecosystem is owned by the same vested interests and so it churns a cacaphony of criticism aimed at making the left feel no accomplishment is good enough and no effort is far enough.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I slightly agree. But more that nothing has been done yet aside from clarifying vague wording in legislation.

      • paultimate14@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        This is already something though. It’s a legal threat.

        We will only see patents actually be seized if the drug companies don’t play ball. They’ll have to choose whether to cooperate or to challenge this in the courts. The govdrnment isn’t trying to seize patents anymore than banks are hoping to repossess property.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            why is everything not different 6 hours after a policy is enacted???

            You, right now.

            • prole@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’ve seen this again and again with younger people in particular (though I’ve also seen the occasional boomer behave similarly). It’s like people have no concept of how long things can take in the real world sometimes.