Striker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoPavlov's conditioninglemmy.worldimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1961arrow-down16
arrow-up1955arrow-down1imagePavlov's conditioninglemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-squareKellamity@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up20·1 year agoPavlov’s dog is not notable for showing that dogs could be conditioned (bell = food time) What it did was show that a conditional response (bell = food time) could cause a reflexive response (saliva) Classical conditioning is not the same as associative learning. Pavlov’s dog is not about associating Thing A with Thing B - that didn’t need a russian scientist to prove.
minus-squareFwoggey@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 year agoI didn’t know that! Also apparently the Barenaked Ladies had it right when they wrote Brian Wilson: It’s a matter of instinct It’s a matter of conditioning and a matter of fact You can call me Pavlov’s Dog Ring a bell and I’ll salivate
minus-squaresamus12345@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·1 year agoPlease Please Please Get a Life Foundation
Pavlov’s dog is not notable for showing that dogs could be conditioned (bell = food time)
What it did was show that a conditional response (bell = food time) could cause a reflexive response (saliva)
Classical conditioning is not the same as associative learning.
Pavlov’s dog is not about associating Thing A with Thing B - that didn’t need a russian scientist to prove.
I didn’t know that! Also apparently the Barenaked Ladies had it right when they wrote Brian Wilson:
It’s a matter of instinct
It’s a matter of conditioning and a matter of fact
You can call me Pavlov’s Dog
Ring a bell and I’ll salivate
Please Please Please Get a Life Foundation