HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoDonald Trump says he never swore oath "to support the Constitution"www.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1407arrow-down110
arrow-up1397arrow-down1external-linkDonald Trump says he never swore oath "to support the Constitution"www.newsweek.comHLMenckenFan@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down3·edit-22 years agoBut didn’t you see he had his fingers crossed? That means he doesn’t have to do it!
minus-squareorclev@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down1·2 years agoThey’re trying to play semantic games and claim that supporting is not the same thing is preserving, protecting, and defending. It’s a laughably bad argument and hopefully it gets struck down pretty much immediately.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·2 years agoHe only quarter to do it
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·2 years agoHmm, I’ve usually heard it pronounced half to, but I guess the ‘correct’ spelling is have to.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoWhat would “half to” even mean?
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·2 years agoWhat does have to mean? Have is possessing something, have to doesn’t make sense either.
But didn’t you see he had his fingers crossed? That means he doesn’t have to do it!
They’re trying to play semantic games and claim that supporting is not the same thing is preserving, protecting, and defending. It’s a laughably bad argument and hopefully it gets struck down pretty much immediately.
He only quarter to do it
Hmm, I’ve usually heard it pronounced half to, but I guess the ‘correct’ spelling is have to.
What would “half to” even mean?
What does have to mean? Have is possessing something, have to doesn’t make sense either.