Mickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agoShe is making a GREAT pointlemmy.worldimagemessage-square377fedilinkarrow-up1750arrow-down1152
arrow-up1598arrow-down1imageShe is making a GREAT pointlemmy.worldMickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square377fedilink
minus-squareHarbinger01173430@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·18 hours agoCan’t females develop antibodies that destroy the sperm? Evolutionary skill issue
minus-squareDefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·17 hours agoPreventing conception would be a genetic trait that evolution selects against. A woman with your theoretical anti-conception genetic mutation would not reproduce, so this mutation dies out immediately.
minus-squareHarbinger01173430@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·15 hours agoBut an antibody they can dispatch on a whim, rather than automatically
Can’t females develop antibodies that destroy the sperm?
Evolutionary skill issue
Preventing conception would be a genetic trait that evolution selects against.
A woman with your theoretical anti-conception genetic mutation would not reproduce, so this mutation dies out immediately.
But an antibody they can dispatch on a whim, rather than automatically