Japan’s governing party leader, Sanae Takaichi, is on track to become the country’s first female prime minister, after finding a badly needed replacement for a crucial partner that left her Liberal Democratic Party’s coalition.
Why are all these women conservative? What’s there to gain for them? I feel like conservative views work against women rather than for them? At least that’s what I’ve grown up believing.
I don’t they care about other women. Or people in general. If you an upper class woman running for politics then such policies would never affect you personally. Consequences are for “lesser” people.
This is just what she choose to built her political career upon, because such views are popular in Japan and therefore she would be able garner support and boring base. What matters is that it will get her to power. I sincerely doubt she actually believes into any of that.
It’s so fucking spineless. People shouldn’t be able to pursue a political career. They should be chosen to lead by peers or some other weird system. Like okay now it’s my turn to bear the responsibility. Otherwise it becomes something people pursue, and it becomes all about the power and the money. Disgusting.
This post is funny, because the folks wanting to oppress others have the most to gain by careering a position of power and influence. Why not be the PM of an aging population?
Well the usual response to this is that people who don’t want to be in position of power would do a shit job at it (to the point of being net negative).
Most people don’t want “bear the responsibility”, they want someone else to do it.
I say let’s have a system whereby if the ruler(s) do a good job according to the wide public, they are rewarded accordingly with taxes. If they do a shit job, they are rewarded with nothing. This way, we get politicians working for us rather than for themselves. I mean it would be also for themselves, but any net gain for them would be forced out of altruism. This way, you would aspire to be a hero if you could manage. And if you weren’t fit to rule, you’d resign very quickly because it would be a waste of your time to gain nothing.
Any holes to poke through this? 👂🔥 All ears! Let’s build a better system!
I guess one hole I could poke myself is it the wide public wanted anarchy and war and garbage like that. But we’d have to establish some ground rules to begin with, like the stuff that protects humans and human rights. Those cannot be taken away. Damn. I had a sleep and this became harder than I thought.
Why are all these women conservative? What’s there to gain for them? I feel like conservative views work against women rather than for them? At least that’s what I’ve grown up believing.
“Rich” is actually the best gender to be.
Some times I wonder. But yeah… Probably.
The class war almost invariably underpins the other apparent social conflicts.
$$
I don’t they care about other women. Or people in general. If you an upper class woman running for politics then such policies would never affect you personally. Consequences are for “lesser” people.
This is just what she choose to built her political career upon, because such views are popular in Japan and therefore she would be able garner support and boring base. What matters is that it will get her to power. I sincerely doubt she actually believes into any of that.
Women aren’t immune from being stupid fucking idiots. Just look at all of the Republican female politicians and entertainment pundits.
Not idiotic, just evil and self-serving. Hell is not a male-only space. 🤷
It can be all 3!
Oh so true. Stupidity is not tied to gender, innit.
It’s so fucking spineless. People shouldn’t be able to pursue a political career. They should be chosen to lead by peers or some other weird system. Like okay now it’s my turn to bear the responsibility. Otherwise it becomes something people pursue, and it becomes all about the power and the money. Disgusting.
This post is funny, because the folks wanting to oppress others have the most to gain by careering a position of power and influence. Why not be the PM of an aging population?
Well the usual response to this is that people who don’t want to be in position of power would do a shit job at it (to the point of being net negative).
Most people don’t want “bear the responsibility”, they want someone else to do it.
I say let’s have a system whereby if the ruler(s) do a good job according to the wide public, they are rewarded accordingly with taxes. If they do a shit job, they are rewarded with nothing. This way, we get politicians working for us rather than for themselves. I mean it would be also for themselves, but any net gain for them would be forced out of altruism. This way, you would aspire to be a hero if you could manage. And if you weren’t fit to rule, you’d resign very quickly because it would be a waste of your time to gain nothing.
Any holes to poke through this? 👂🔥 All ears! Let’s build a better system!
I guess one hole I could poke myself is it the wide public wanted anarchy and war and garbage like that. But we’d have to establish some ground rules to begin with, like the stuff that protects humans and human rights. Those cannot be taken away. Damn. I had a sleep and this became harder than I thought.
If you are in power, your gender becomes irrelevant.
Why else would a fuckton of oppressive monarchs be women?
I got it, yeah. Depressing af isn’t it.