• cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Admin right on the automotive parts seems like asking for trouble by default. While I’m very much in favor of owning and controlling all my devices, cars feels like weapons we put in the hand of the general public because they’re deemed safe under regulations, so… yeah.

    However, an EV with a separate automotive computer that only do car stuff under strict control, connected to another one that do management, UI, entertainment, etc. that’s more open, I could see that. As long as the proprietary one have decent changelogs (that you’d have to trust, sadly) and can be updated at will with a decent UX instead of “your car’s dead this morning lol”. That sound like a viable compromise.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Any bad thing the user wants to do with the car can already be done by the person with the keys. Allowing the user more control could prevent someone including a terrorist or enemy state from doing something bad to millions of people like virtually cutting everyone’s brakes at once.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I only agree if that separation means the vehicle cannot be remotely disabled by the manufacturer; on purpose or by accident.