TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website to Star Trek Social Club@startrek.websiteEnglish · 1 month agoIn this dire time ...startrek.websiteimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1118arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1117arrow-down1imageIn this dire time ...startrek.websiteTribblesBestFriend@startrek.website to Star Trek Social Club@startrek.websiteEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square16fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDasus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoAlso, an ad hominem is an attack against the person instead of the argument. If you attack the argument and then the person, that’s not technically an ad hominem.
minus-squarecaptainlezbian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoExactly. “No because you’re an idiot” is ad hominem, but “no because x, and you’re an idiot for thinking that” is valid albeit rude
minus-squarecaseyweederman@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoNo, that would be an and hominem.
Also, an ad hominem is an attack against the person instead of the argument.
If you attack the argument and then the person, that’s not technically an ad hominem.
Exactly. “No because you’re an idiot” is ad hominem, but “no because x, and you’re an idiot for thinking that” is valid albeit rude
No, that would be an and hominem.