I respect people’s right to use apple products, but please stop asserting “privacy”, big corps doesn’t give a shit.

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    They just do that for brand optics. Because researchers found the apple privacy settings off/on made no difference to the packet of info sent to apple. Their privacy is a facade.

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I can believe this. Apple loves to talk big about privacy but their source for it is “trust me bro.”

    • dudleyflippendoodle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      The issue in one of the cases (San Bernardino) had nothing to do with iCloud data, and everything to do with the data on the device itself. The FBI request was a backdoor into the device. Apple (rightly) refused to add a backdoor to access the phone.

      You are referencing data that goes to Apple’s iCloud servers, which Apple was happy to provide because they held the encryption keys. Since then, they have enabled an E2E encryption feature for iCloud data.

      I am happy to discuss Apple’s shortcomings, but let’s be clear on which ones we’re discussing

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Its the don’t track privacy type settings where you opt out, research found it was a toggle button that did nothing.

        They only tout privacy to gain market, they would sell us out for a dollar

        • dudleyflippendoodle@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Is this separate from Advanced Data Protection, which is E2E encrypted data on iCloud?

          “Don’t track privacy type settings” isn’t very descriptive, so apologies if I’m sounding any way I’m just trying to be clear about what the complaint here is.

          And to be clear, is this a privacy concern exclusive to Apple?

          • BCsven@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Totally unrelated to the E2E, I will have to search for it. It was a year or two ago. Apple claimed turning off the data collection kept your use private to you, but was just a lie, they collected all your data anyway.

            And yes, its an IPhone setting not an android setting. Google is another issue.

                • dudleyflippendoodle@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  While the amount of data gathered is concerning, the type of data is still considered telemetry, which you still agree to have them collect when accepting the terms and conditions of the App Store.

                  That isn’t to say I’m happy Apple is doing this, but I wanted to start by making that distinction: Apple isn’t “ignoring” your preference to turn off personalized ads, it’s collecting telemetry data which you’ve already given them permission to do when signing up for and using the App Store. The issue with this telemetry data from a privacy perspective is the amount and the fact that it can still be used to identify a user. These are rightly concerning.

                  It looks like a class-action suit was brought against them for this, and as of September of 2024 a judge trimmed some of the claims, but refused to toss out the suit meaning Apple has to defend themselves. Unfortunately that’s all the information I can find. Do you have anything from after that point? I’m only asking because I don’t and would like to know how it’s going.

                  Sucks Apple is doing this for sure, but at this point unfortunately it doesn’t seem to violate any existing agreements (would like to see how the class-action progresses to confirm this) and there is still no sign that they’re selling this data or using it to deliver you personalized ads. Pending the results of the suit I’m gonna have to reiterate that even with this, they’re absolutely the lesser evil. But still an evil.

                  They would sell us out for a dollar

                  Still possible but also still unfounded, so far.

                  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    I have to search through two years of podcasts LOL. The issue is the setting misinforms the user. On: we collect your dara, off: we don’t. But they still were. Had they had no toggle it would fall under TOS. But giving a person a facade of choice is dubious