I give you permission to no longer disclose AI use.
If you are confronted with AI accusations, just remain silent
There’s really no upside to AI disclosure
Let them evaluate what you’ve done on their own
You don’t have to tell them “this was badly made and you should feel bad”
If you prime them for negativity that’s just what you’re going to get.
You’ll notice most makes of images do not discuss the images they put out into the world
You’re supposed to leave it to interpretation of the viewer.
Imagine if the Obama Hope poster guy was just saying how easy it was for him to posterize some politician’s picture plus bottom text.
If you tell them it’s low brow, they won’t be able to enjoy it for what it is
Don’t worry, this is shitpost, it’s supposed to be shit, you don’t have to tell anyone
how shit it really it
Well, as most AI seems to prohibit directly asking for an artist’s specific style but instead generic style keywords, that would be difficult to name any one artist in the credits.
I mean, I could credit “cubist painters” or “neo-impressionists” (even if neo-impressionism doesn’t even exist yet, it occupies a space in the “latent space” that can be diiscovered in AI)
But before anything like that can happen, the internet needs to stop having a “shoot on sight” policy for anyone using AI. And I don’t see that happening anytime soon given how sudden and traumatic AI is being as a technology and how it went from free-for-all to “digital guardrail prison” in less than two years.
I give you permission to no longer disclose AI use.
If you are confronted with AI accusations, just remain silent
There’s really no upside to AI disclosure
Let them evaluate what you’ve done on their own
You don’t have to tell them “this was badly made and you should feel bad”
If you prime them for negativity that’s just what you’re going to get.
You’ll notice most makes of images do not discuss the images they put out into the world
You’re supposed to leave it to interpretation of the viewer.
Imagine if the Obama Hope poster guy was just saying how easy it was for him to posterize some politician’s picture plus bottom text.
If you tell them it’s low brow, they won’t be able to enjoy it for what it is
Don’t worry, this is shitpost, it’s supposed to be shit, you don’t have to tell anyone how shit it really it
I disagree, I think it should be disclosed so actual artists get credit when they do the hard work
Well, as most AI seems to prohibit directly asking for an artist’s specific style but instead generic style keywords, that would be difficult to name any one artist in the credits.
I mean, I could credit “cubist painters” or “neo-impressionists” (even if neo-impressionism doesn’t even exist yet, it occupies a space in the “latent space” that can be diiscovered in AI)
But before anything like that can happen, the internet needs to stop having a “shoot on sight” policy for anyone using AI. And I don’t see that happening anytime soon given how sudden and traumatic AI is being as a technology and how it went from free-for-all to “digital guardrail prison” in less than two years.
Found the Ai simp
Blocked
Yes that’s exactly why it’s ok to lie, because of anti-ai bigots like you !