I dont have to answer tour question cause it s not the subject and one wrong doesn’t make it right in the both sens. Your rebuttal of what is litteraly a lie specially when he s given the opportunity to explain himself further and to just walk back a false stetament is hypocritical. Tell me what he said when he come back on broadcast
My rebuttle was a one sentence description of how what Kimmel said was the truth.
One sentence. No lie. I even simplified it for better reading comprehension.
You are just unwilling to use your brain to see it that way, the same way you are unwilling to answer a single question.
I answered yours. Multiple times. Despite you insulting me.
So sure, you don’t NEED to answer off topic questions. But it certainly would be nice to see you practice what you preach instead of always running away from words and sentences. Words can never hurt you, just sticks and stones.
It’s clear to me why you can’t even read a sentence or answer a yes or no question. As that would require a freedom you have already willingly given up: Thinking for yourself.
You have spent this entire conversation repeating talking points I’ve proven to you are lies. Lies you can’t admit to hearing, so you’ll repeat them without caring. You never think to yourself if they might be real. Because you’ve given up the ability to think for yourself now that MAGA can do it for you.
New YES or NO:
Have you lied to me?
You have about Patel.
You have about politicians legally needing to tell the truth.
You have about the shooter being leftist
All proven lies, with supported links I’ve already provided.
No offense. But only an idiot would believe you weren’t lying to me about Kimmel at this point too.
These are your actions. Adults usually care when they are caught lying repeatedly, because it makes them appear untrustworthy. Which is what you very much appear as now.
Prove you can be trusted:
YES or NO:
Have you lied to me?
I can’t think for you. Maybe consider doing it yourself if you haven’t in a while?
i applaud your dedication. you give a true sens to words like keyboard warrior.
but im gonna be honest, what i call a 1 u call it a 2 and we simply can’t agree on fondamental point. for me he lied and that s it, youe explanation are excuse and that s it. Your self importance and preachy attitude telling me i can’t think for myself is simple uncheck ego. Cause yeah any free thinker that are smart enough will conclude as you, cause on any subject the issue of disagreement is always because of ppl being lesser than other. Since you couldnt admit he was simple and plain lying i had fun reading what you send but that becamme ridicoullous the faact u seem to belive you right on any point. so im just gonna debunk your false accusation of your last post and we gonna see what your boy gonna say when he comme back on tv, cause u watch him right ? you didnt do all of this for not watching him ?
i didnt lied about Patel, i repost info as they were
i didnt lied about politician needing to tell the truth, you seem to forget that what you cite is about a particular contexte that doesnt apply H24 7/7
about the shooter being leftits you are dishonest and u know it. u dont shoot a right wing commentator with casing where it s written cath that facist plus telling it was against hate and your own familly telling you were under leftist influence to dismiss everything cause now u find authority that are worth your trust cause they said something that please you but all the other where wrong.
i simply enjoying the fact that’s your gonna watch jimmy your boy and i wont even impose that at gantanamo. have fun having somebody that did black face and harass women on national tv as your idol. you make my day.
we have the heroes we desserve and yours are one that use violence against somebody that peacefully debate others without hate or violence and the other is preachy asshole that s the most corporate bland of tv that like i said did black face and harrass women on national tv. But i know your moral compass is it s all square if they agree with you
i hade fun watching this :https://youtu.be/uLTeMC81FV0
but i will have more fun knowing you watched jimmy kiemel rofl
What I call a 1 is a 1.
All the evidence I provided says it’s a 1.
You are just unwilling to admit it’s anything but a 2.
Because you were lied to about it being a 2. So you are literally unwilling to see it any other way - because that would require admitting Trump lies to you. Which you very clearly lack the ability to do.
I honestly don’t give a shit about Kimmel. But I do give a shit about his right to say whatever he wants in a free country because I’m an American.
You believe lies instead of the constitution. And are too weak to admit it.
The network’s removal of Mr. Kimmel’s show last week almost immediately morphed into a flashpoint for free speech in America.
Kimmel’s coming back to TV because he didn’t do anything wrong in our free country. So, why have you been on the OPPOSITE SIDE of that conversation this whole time?
Whatever your 2 is, sure isn’t American. Yes or No?
So you are literally unwilling to see it any other way - because that would require admitting Trump lies to you
Lmao. I dont know what s your fixation on him but I never talk about him. It has nothing to do with the subject matter. All I will say on the subject is I’m glad he s the president on the sole fact he seem to piss you a lot.
About your article can’t read a paywall and while it morphed litteraly mean change in something else like it wasn’t the original subject. Tell me what he said when he goes back online. And keep watching him he s so talented and a net plus for society
I’m glad he s the president on the sole fact he seem to piss you a lot.
Of course you’re happy Americans are upset about Trump. Because you care more about him than America. Obviously.
I just care about the constitution he’s violating. And you would too if you cared about this country as much as you do Trump.
Lmao. I dont know what s your fixation on him…
YOU HAVE THE FIXATION, sir. Not me. And your fixation is why you can’t hear Kimmels words instead of Trumps. That’s why I’ve asked 9 times. You literally can’t hear someone if Trump tells you what they said first.
The Kimmel controversy erupted last week after conservatives criticized a Kimmel monologue comment on Monday about the MAGA responses to the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
MAYBE he never said the shooter was MAGA: yes or no?
You can’t admit someone MIGHT be correct instead of Trump.
The shooter wasn’t leftist: Yes or No?
You can’t admit this is a lie. One you’ve now spread for days.
The head of our FBI accused the wrong person of being the shooter: Yes or No?
You can’t even admit how poorly this makes our government look because Trump has lied to you about it being better than ever.
Because you let Trump speak and do everything for you without considering if it’s true.
Thats why this conversation has always been about Trump, because you are the best example of why your own advice about the Truth in society is needed:
if u question why telling the truth is better for society i feel all your argument regarding the other side of yours can be dismissed.
Let’s prove it now - would Trump be better for society if he told the truth? Yes or no?
According to you, your garuanteed failure to answer that question means the entire side of your argument should be dismissed.
Kimmel said the MAGA movement was trying to score political points by trying to prove that the 22-year-old suspect accused of killing Kirk is not one of its own.
Also if it was gouvernement overeach dont u think they would do more than simply one official answering during an interview that maybe he broke the law ? Like having real consequence. Cause here it s simply the major that said jimmy u fucked it up. Take one week vacation. And that s all. What was the attack on free speech ?
Respectfully, read the statement again focusing on the word NOT.
Kimmel said the MAGA movement was trying to score political points by trying to prove that the 22-year-old suspect accused of killing Kirk is NOT one of its own.
“NOT one of its own” = NOT MAGA
Shooter = NOT MAGA
MAGA wants the shooter = NOT MAGA.
Which is what Kimmel said. And is very true.
As for why it’s an attack on Free Speech, it’s not hard to show. However, it is going to require a few links to paint the bigger picture -
To start, here’s how Republicans felt about executive orders in 2014 and how it’s tyranny to use them to bypass congress:
finding a Republican who’d denounce [Presidents] executive actions… was easier than breathing. “There’s a Constitution that we all take an oath to, including him, and following the Constitution is the basis for House Republicans.”
More resonant warnings followed, from Republicans who had been characterizing all of [Presidents] actions—as petty tyranny… wrote Texas Sen. Ted Cruz in the Wall Street Journal - When a president can pick and choose which laws to follow and which to ignore, he is no longer a president.”
Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul weighed in, too, “I think it’s disturbing… on the idea that he can go around Congress
Basically, a President using executive orders to bypass 1/3 of our system of government (congress) is tyranny, and against the constitution that President is supposed to protect. Ted Cruz stated any President who ruled entirely through executive order like this was not a President.
Something I agree with.
Because the FCC was an independant government agency until 2025. They regulated what was on TV with no influence from the government at all.
The FCC has long held that ‘the public interest is best served by permitting free expression of views,’” the FCC says on its website.
Until this year. When Trump expanded our government to control them. By issuing an executive order that bypassed congress (1/3 of our checks and balances) to expand the executive branch to control dozens of agencies that used to be Independant. The FCC is one of those agencies, and is now part of the executive branch instead of existing outside the government.
This is VERY important to understand when it comes to the first amendment, because:
In 1963, the US Supreme Court issued a key ruling that the government cannot create a “system of informal censorship” by putting pressure on private companies.
The FCC is now the government, not independant, so it cannot influence private companies without violating the Frist Amendment as ruled by the Supreme Court in 1963.
Yet here’s the head of the FCC doing just that:
FCC Chair Brendan Carr suggested Jimmy Kimmel should be suspended and said, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way,”… Within a matter of hours, ABC suspended Kimmel’s show “indefinitely,” a stunning move that has raised serious First Amendment concerns.
Those concerns are about government overreach from the FCC. Which is now a part of our government through the tyranny of executive order. Trump is using them to censors private companies despite that clearly being protected by the First Amendment as I’ve linked above.
And he will keep doing it because Republicans only have a spine to protect our Constitution from a black president, not actual tyranny.
TYRANNY - Dictionary - noun
cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control.
Give me a reason the FCC is now part of the executive branch that isn’t a MAGA lie.
Executive control of the FCC wasn’t needed for 9/11. Or Covid. Or anything else. But it is now? Why? What reason could possibly be more important than 9/11?
If there’s no good reason, his expansion of government to control them is unreasonable.
Which is literal, by definition, Tryanny. And what Republicans used to care about.
Instead, Trump is actively using his extended powers over the FCC, granted to him by himself (not congress) to attack Kimmels right to Free Speech despite it clearly being Constitutionally protected as coming from a private company.
If Trump didn’t control the FCC, this likely wouldn’t be against the First Amendment. But the FCC wouldn’t do anything like this unless it was controlled by Trump. That’s why he issued an executive order to control it.
Which again, is both tyrannical AND and a very explicit and intentional disregard for the Constitution and our First Amendment rights over censorship it protects. The government cannot put pressure on private companies to censor them, yet Trump took control of the FCC so his government could do just that.
What happens next is Trump will keep overruling the Constitution by executive order, as he has been, eventually to the point where only some groups are safe to practice free speech. Effectively robbing it from everyone the Constitution grants it to, and giving it only to whoever he wants.
And you will be okay with it because Trump will surely give MAGA another lie to believe.
At least until he takes away something you do care about. Then it’ll matter.
Until then, you’ll likely just keep running away from any yes or no questions that might indicate this is what’s happening as a consequence of Trumps lies.
I dont have to answer tour question cause it s not the subject and one wrong doesn’t make it right in the both sens. Your rebuttal of what is litteraly a lie specially when he s given the opportunity to explain himself further and to just walk back a false stetament is hypocritical. Tell me what he said when he come back on broadcast
Troll
My rebuttle was a one sentence description of how what Kimmel said was the truth.
One sentence. No lie. I even simplified it for better reading comprehension.
You are just unwilling to use your brain to see it that way, the same way you are unwilling to answer a single question.
I answered yours. Multiple times. Despite you insulting me.
So sure, you don’t NEED to answer off topic questions. But it certainly would be nice to see you practice what you preach instead of always running away from words and sentences. Words can never hurt you, just sticks and stones.
It’s clear to me why you can’t even read a sentence or answer a yes or no question. As that would require a freedom you have already willingly given up: Thinking for yourself.
You have spent this entire conversation repeating talking points I’ve proven to you are lies. Lies you can’t admit to hearing, so you’ll repeat them without caring. You never think to yourself if they might be real. Because you’ve given up the ability to think for yourself now that MAGA can do it for you.
New YES or NO:
Have you lied to me?
All proven lies, with supported links I’ve already provided.
No offense. But only an idiot would believe you weren’t lying to me about Kimmel at this point too.
These are your actions. Adults usually care when they are caught lying repeatedly, because it makes them appear untrustworthy. Which is what you very much appear as now.
Prove you can be trusted:
YES or NO:
Have you lied to me?
I can’t think for you. Maybe consider doing it yourself if you haven’t in a while?
i applaud your dedication. you give a true sens to words like keyboard warrior. but im gonna be honest, what i call a 1 u call it a 2 and we simply can’t agree on fondamental point. for me he lied and that s it, youe explanation are excuse and that s it. Your self importance and preachy attitude telling me i can’t think for myself is simple uncheck ego. Cause yeah any free thinker that are smart enough will conclude as you, cause on any subject the issue of disagreement is always because of ppl being lesser than other. Since you couldnt admit he was simple and plain lying i had fun reading what you send but that becamme ridicoullous the faact u seem to belive you right on any point. so im just gonna debunk your false accusation of your last post and we gonna see what your boy gonna say when he comme back on tv, cause u watch him right ? you didnt do all of this for not watching him ?
i didnt lied about Patel, i repost info as they were i didnt lied about politician needing to tell the truth, you seem to forget that what you cite is about a particular contexte that doesnt apply H24 7/7 about the shooter being leftits you are dishonest and u know it. u dont shoot a right wing commentator with casing where it s written cath that facist plus telling it was against hate and your own familly telling you were under leftist influence to dismiss everything cause now u find authority that are worth your trust cause they said something that please you but all the other where wrong.
i simply enjoying the fact that’s your gonna watch jimmy your boy and i wont even impose that at gantanamo. have fun having somebody that did black face and harass women on national tv as your idol. you make my day.
we have the heroes we desserve and yours are one that use violence against somebody that peacefully debate others without hate or violence and the other is preachy asshole that s the most corporate bland of tv that like i said did black face and harrass women on national tv. But i know your moral compass is it s all square if they agree with you
i hade fun watching this :https://youtu.be/uLTeMC81FV0 but i will have more fun knowing you watched jimmy kiemel rofl
What I call a 1 is a 1. All the evidence I provided says it’s a 1. You are just unwilling to admit it’s anything but a 2.
Because you were lied to about it being a 2. So you are literally unwilling to see it any other way - because that would require admitting Trump lies to you. Which you very clearly lack the ability to do.
I honestly don’t give a shit about Kimmel. But I do give a shit about his right to say whatever he wants in a free country because I’m an American.
You believe lies instead of the constitution. And are too weak to admit it.
Here’s proof: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/22/business/media/jimmy-kimmel-returns-abc.html
Kimmel’s coming back to TV because he didn’t do anything wrong in our free country. So, why have you been on the OPPOSITE SIDE of that conversation this whole time?
Whatever your 2 is, sure isn’t American. Yes or No?
Lmao. I dont know what s your fixation on him but I never talk about him. It has nothing to do with the subject matter. All I will say on the subject is I’m glad he s the president on the sole fact he seem to piss you a lot.
About your article can’t read a paywall and while it morphed litteraly mean change in something else like it wasn’t the original subject. Tell me what he said when he goes back online. And keep watching him he s so talented and a net plus for society
Of course you’re happy Americans are upset about Trump. Because you care more about him than America. Obviously.
I just care about the constitution he’s violating. And you would too if you cared about this country as much as you do Trump.
YOU HAVE THE FIXATION, sir. Not me. And your fixation is why you can’t hear Kimmels words instead of Trumps. That’s why I’ve asked 9 times. You literally can’t hear someone if Trump tells you what they said first.
MAYBE he never said the shooter was MAGA: yes or no?
You can’t admit someone MIGHT be correct instead of Trump.
The shooter wasn’t leftist: Yes or No? You can’t admit this is a lie. One you’ve now spread for days.
The head of our FBI accused the wrong person of being the shooter: Yes or No?
You can’t even admit how poorly this makes our government look because Trump has lied to you about it being better than ever.
Because you let Trump speak and do everything for you without considering if it’s true.
Thats why this conversation has always been about Trump, because you are the best example of why your own advice about the Truth in society is needed:
Let’s prove it now - would Trump be better for society if he told the truth? Yes or no?
According to you, your garuanteed failure to answer that question means the entire side of your argument should be dismissed.
Your article sir
Also if it was gouvernement overeach dont u think they would do more than simply one official answering during an interview that maybe he broke the law ? Like having real consequence. Cause here it s simply the major that said jimmy u fucked it up. Take one week vacation. And that s all. What was the attack on free speech ?
Respectfully, read the statement again focusing on the word NOT.
“NOT one of its own” = NOT MAGA
Shooter = NOT MAGA
MAGA wants the shooter = NOT MAGA.
Which is what Kimmel said. And is very true.
As for why it’s an attack on Free Speech, it’s not hard to show. However, it is going to require a few links to paint the bigger picture -
To start, here’s how Republicans felt about executive orders in 2014 and how it’s tyranny to use them to bypass congress:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2014/01/gop-leaders-are-appalled-that-the-president-would-issue-an-executive-order.html
Basically, a President using executive orders to bypass 1/3 of our system of government (congress) is tyranny, and against the constitution that President is supposed to protect. Ted Cruz stated any President who ruled entirely through executive order like this was not a President.
Something I agree with.
Because the FCC was an independant government agency until 2025. They regulated what was on TV with no influence from the government at all.
Until this year. When Trump expanded our government to control them. By issuing an executive order that bypassed congress (1/3 of our checks and balances) to expand the executive branch to control dozens of agencies that used to be Independant. The FCC is one of those agencies, and is now part of the executive branch instead of existing outside the government.
https://www.consumerfinancemonitor.com/2025/02/26/trump-takes-control-of-independent-agencies/
This is VERY important to understand when it comes to the first amendment, because:
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/9/19/does-jimmy-kimmels-removal-over-charlie-kirk-violate-freedom-of-speech
The FCC is now the government, not independant, so it cannot influence private companies without violating the Frist Amendment as ruled by the Supreme Court in 1963.
Yet here’s the head of the FCC doing just that:
https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/18/media/brendan-carr-jimmy-kimmel-fcc-first-amendment
Those concerns are about government overreach from the FCC. Which is now a part of our government through the tyranny of executive order. Trump is using them to censors private companies despite that clearly being protected by the First Amendment as I’ve linked above.
And he will keep doing it because Republicans only have a spine to protect our Constitution from a black president, not actual tyranny.
Give me a reason the FCC is now part of the executive branch that isn’t a MAGA lie.
Executive control of the FCC wasn’t needed for 9/11. Or Covid. Or anything else. But it is now? Why? What reason could possibly be more important than 9/11?
If there’s no good reason, his expansion of government to control them is unreasonable.
Which is literal, by definition, Tryanny. And what Republicans used to care about.
Instead, Trump is actively using his extended powers over the FCC, granted to him by himself (not congress) to attack Kimmels right to Free Speech despite it clearly being Constitutionally protected as coming from a private company.
If Trump didn’t control the FCC, this likely wouldn’t be against the First Amendment. But the FCC wouldn’t do anything like this unless it was controlled by Trump. That’s why he issued an executive order to control it.
Which again, is both tyrannical AND and a very explicit and intentional disregard for the Constitution and our First Amendment rights over censorship it protects. The government cannot put pressure on private companies to censor them, yet Trump took control of the FCC so his government could do just that.
What happens next is Trump will keep overruling the Constitution by executive order, as he has been, eventually to the point where only some groups are safe to practice free speech. Effectively robbing it from everyone the Constitution grants it to, and giving it only to whoever he wants.
And you will be okay with it because Trump will surely give MAGA another lie to believe.
At least until he takes away something you do care about. Then it’ll matter.
Until then, you’ll likely just keep running away from any yes or no questions that might indicate this is what’s happening as a consequence of Trumps lies.