most people hate ai, but the bots on lemmy are an acception since they bring life to the communities when activities dries up. I mean- am I wrong here?thoughts? opinions?

  • rob299@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel people are just misunderstanding, I don’t see why there’s so much backlash, let me explain my thoughts process in more detail.

    my idea was actually more like this.

    sometimes a bot might post an article, sometimes a real person. if the article is relavent, then real people might join in to discuss the article, which on this community this happens.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re saying a bot can pose a discussion prompt (taken from some rss feed or whatever), a totally reasonable (if perhaps not ideal) observation.

      A lot of the people in this thread seem to be assuming you’re talking about GPT or whatever making up threads whole-cloth.

      You did say “ai” though, so this is kinda on you.

      • rob299@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I did say ai. I said

        “ai, but the bots.” People in this thread were actually legitly saying their stance on bots. and also on ai. which, if I’m wrong then i’m wrong, I accept the critisism. personally this post could be a meme at this point. 27 downvotes, that’s crazy on Lemmy. I hadn’t seen a post on this communitywith as many, not sure if that’s a record or not. for this community.

        edit: now 26 and if any changes further, then that’s where the number is .