Almost 90 bombs were dropped in one region in just 24 hours.

Russia unleashed an unprecedented bombardment in southern Ukraine overnight in what local officials described as a “massive attack” in the conflict which has continued to rage even as the international community’s attention has moved to the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

The Ukrainian Internal Affairs Ministry on Monday morning said Russia dropped at least “87 aerial bombs on populated areas of the Kherson region - the largest number for all time.” At least eight people were also injured in other Russian strikes carried out in the Odessa region further to the west on Sunday night.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    If we’d shift funds from Israel (who are committing genocide) to Ukraine (who are defending themselves) it helps Palestine and hurts Russia too.

    Is a win/win.

    Imagine if Ukraine had the iron dome America bought Israel.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Israel doesn’t actually need American money, unfortunately. Sure, it helps them, but they can continue this campaign for a long time without a dollar from the U.S. Ukraine, on the other hand, is a much more desperate situation. I’m not saying that means we shouldn’t shift funds from Israel to Ukraine, because I agree we should do that, but it will likely not help Palestinians much.

    • BB69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      56
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Imagine all the dead Jews that would cause too.

      Palestine isn’t a nation of saints.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Israel assassinates journalists and sells weapons grade hacking technology to oppressive regimes.

        Also, until Israel started their ground assault Jews hadn’t really been dying since 7 October. Almost all deaths since then have been Palestinian.

    • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      64
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a lot of misinformation in your comment.

      The United States didn’t fund Israel’s iron dome system.

      There isn’t a genocide (race / tribe killing) in Gaza. That’s a population transfer or eviction of lands.

      Ukraine and the United States are working together to implement a air defense system. A likely defense treaty and a 100 year lease on military bases in exchange for infrastructure rebuilding is on the table.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There isn’t a genocide (race / tribe killing) in Gaza

        Genocide isn’t just killing…

        In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

        Killing members of the group;

        Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

        Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

        Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

        Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

        https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml

        And even if that was just indiscriminate killing based on race/ethnicity, the UN is already saying what Israel is doing amounts to that

        https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/11/gaza-running-out-time-un-experts-warn-demanding-ceasefire-prevent-genocide

        Your opinion is your opinion.

        But what is/isn’t a genocide is clearly defined in the Geneva convention. And even if you’re definition was correct, the UN disagrees with you about Israel meeting that definition.

          • jarfil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Some wars are about who gets control over some resources, or who will be collecting the taxes, without trying to wipe out the other side.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                If that was true, then I’m sure there’s lots of statements from human rights organizations world wide clarifying how it’s wrong.

                Do you mind linking one?

                Quick edit:

                Also, that doesn’t mean Israel isn’t breaking the Geneva Convention…

                In fact, it seems to be admission that they are…

                • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  15
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It will take a bit to pull it from the 1948 archive but Raphael Lemkin used it because it was a loaded word to mean killing millions of people.

                  The actual UN definition added any transfer of children from one ethnic group to another in the last week of negotiations in 1948. Even by that definition it doesn’t meet the UN term with what is happening in Gaza.

                  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    So to clarify, you agree that Israel is violating the Geneva Convention?

                    Your issue is just that the Genocide section is called that?

                    If all this is really that pedantic and you understand that human rights abuses are bad, and Israel is committing human rights abuses, I guess I’ll take what I can get.

                    But it seems like you’re defending the acts Israel are committing on the basis that the section of the genocide section of the Geneva Convention is more in depth than just saying “don’t exterminate every single person in a group”.

                    Because by that logic, there wasn’t a genocide in North America for over a century against the indigenous people…

                    Even by that definition it doesn’t meet the UN term with what is happening in Gaza.

                    Your still ignoring the majority of what the Geneva Convention says…

                    I’ve linked it multiple times, and even quoted it once so you don’t have to click the link…

                    https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml

                    Specifically

                    Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

                    And

                    Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

                    But the link really goes into specifics that you should know, just read the link.