AI-ters.
    • MudMan@fedia.io
      46·
      3 days ago

      That is correct.

      It is also correct that someone disagreeing with me can be doing so because of a moral panic. Our agreement is entirely disconnected to whether there is a moral panic at play or not.

      For the record, I think “AI” is profoundly problematic in multiple ways.

      This is also unrelated to whether there is a moral panic about it. Which there absolutely is.

      • abbotsbury@lemmy.worldEnglish
        72·
        3 days ago

        long winded way to say your objections are logical and sound while everyone else is just having a panic, you little moralizer you.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          46·
          3 days ago

          Well, no, it’s a concise way to say some objections are logical and sound and some are stemming from a moral panic.

          Whether I agree with the objections on each camp is, again, irrelevant.

          I disagree with some of the non-moral panic objections, too, and I’m happy to have that conversation.

          Four possible types of objections in this scenario, if you want to be “logical” about it:

          • Objections that aren’t moral panic that I agree with.
          • Objections that aren’t moral panic that I disagree with.
          • Objections that are moral panic that I disagree with.
          • Objections that are moral panic that I agree with.

          I think there aren’t any in that last group, but there are certainly at least some objections in all other three.