I already did. Leftism is about progressing to the next mode of production, it’s historically progressive and revolutionary. Rightism is about retaining the current system or trying to go backwards, ie the “good old days.” Socialism is left wing, capitalism is right wing. Liberalism is the ideological superstructure of capitalism, ergo it’s right wing.
Secondly, you never actually answered me about what it means to be left wing, or why you think capitalism is left wing. You just copied and pastied the first things you googled without engaging with the points made by others here and myself.
It’s Marxist theory. Marxism is not a universal theory on the subject. It’s one of many lenses. So no he’s not correct. It’s more nuanced than they’re suggesting. Which is misinformation.
No? Give me something that proves it isn’t. I have quoted everything from dictionaries to Princeton to media and all anyone is doing is repeating Marxist theory you’re the trumpets of the left. Sorry but it’s true
I have a Marxist PoV, as I am a Marxist-Leninist, but that isn’t why liberalism is right-wing. Liberalism is right-wing because it is based on private property rights as the centerpoint, and that is the status quo. Maintaining the current status quo is a right-wing, conservative point of view, while the revolutionary, progressive point of view is in socialized ownership.
The definitions you keep linking are from liberal organizations that are benefited by constraining the window of political economic discussion to the confines of capitalist viewpoints. Often, they rely on the Overton Window, which is about what is considered more progressive or reactionary in a given window by the median opinion, ie if you have 100 people in a room, 3 are communists, 67 are bog-standard liberals, and 30 are conservative liberals, then by the Overton Window, you’d have 50 on the left and 50 on the right, with most liberals on the left. However, this erases the actually increasing momentum for socialism, and hides the fact that 97 people in the room are for the current system plus tweaks, and only 3 are for radical change.
The origin of the terms “left” began in France, when capitalism and liberalism were revolutionary, and monarchism was the status quo. We are far beyond the time when liberalism is capable of being seen as revolutionary, however, most of the world is dominated by private property. It is now socialism that is revolutionary, and it has been so for centuries.
I’ve provided a more nuanced, thorough, and complete analysis than you have, which is why other users are suggesting you listen to me. I can recommend some good works on political economic theory, if you’d like. There’s a difference between nuance, and vibes, and you’ve relied heavily on vibes over nuance.
I’ve been answering a lot of stuff here. How about you tell me what you define it as
I already did. Leftism is about progressing to the next mode of production, it’s historically progressive and revolutionary. Rightism is about retaining the current system or trying to go backwards, ie the “good old days.” Socialism is left wing, capitalism is right wing. Liberalism is the ideological superstructure of capitalism, ergo it’s right wing.
Secondly, you never actually answered me about what it means to be left wing, or why you think capitalism is left wing. You just copied and pastied the first things you googled without engaging with the points made by others here and myself.
Have you heard of cooperatives. Would you categorize a cooperative as a right leaning concept
Melvin, you should listen to Cowbee. You’re misinformed, but don’t have to stay that way.
It’s Marxist theory. Marxism is not a universal theory on the subject. It’s one of many lenses. So no he’s not correct. It’s more nuanced than they’re suggesting. Which is misinformation.
Okay, I changed my mind, you’re actually a goober. Good luck out there little buddy.
No? Give me something that proves it isn’t. I have quoted everything from dictionaries to Princeton to media and all anyone is doing is repeating Marxist theory you’re the trumpets of the left. Sorry but it’s true
See my comment here.
I have a Marxist PoV, as I am a Marxist-Leninist, but that isn’t why liberalism is right-wing. Liberalism is right-wing because it is based on private property rights as the centerpoint, and that is the status quo. Maintaining the current status quo is a right-wing, conservative point of view, while the revolutionary, progressive point of view is in socialized ownership.
The definitions you keep linking are from liberal organizations that are benefited by constraining the window of political economic discussion to the confines of capitalist viewpoints. Often, they rely on the Overton Window, which is about what is considered more progressive or reactionary in a given window by the median opinion, ie if you have 100 people in a room, 3 are communists, 67 are bog-standard liberals, and 30 are conservative liberals, then by the Overton Window, you’d have 50 on the left and 50 on the right, with most liberals on the left. However, this erases the actually increasing momentum for socialism, and hides the fact that 97 people in the room are for the current system plus tweaks, and only 3 are for radical change.
The origin of the terms “left” began in France, when capitalism and liberalism were revolutionary, and monarchism was the status quo. We are far beyond the time when liberalism is capable of being seen as revolutionary, however, most of the world is dominated by private property. It is now socialism that is revolutionary, and it has been so for centuries.
I’ve provided a more nuanced, thorough, and complete analysis than you have, which is why other users are suggesting you listen to me. I can recommend some good works on political economic theory, if you’d like. There’s a difference between nuance, and vibes, and you’ve relied heavily on vibes over nuance.
Neither left nor right, really, it depends on the context.
Again, though, you never answered me.
Hmmmmm really?
It’s being definition 😂
What?