• vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Yeah but it’s just a start to reverse the process and prove that there is no AI. We only started with generating text I bet people figure out how to reverse process by using some sort of Rosetta Stone. It’s just probabilities after all.

    • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That’s possible but it’s not what the authors found.

      They spend a fair amount of the conclusion emphasizing how exploratory and ambiguous their findings are. The researchers themselves are very careful to point out that this is not a smoking gun.

      • vane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah authors rely on the recent deep mind paper https://aclanthology.org/2025.naacl-long.469.pdf ( they even cite it ) that describes (n, p)-discoverable extraction. This is recent studies because right now there are no boundaries, basically people made something and now they study their creation. We’re probably years from something like gdpr for llm.