In China, you can’t exist without a smartphone, because for all existential things you have to do (paying bills, buying tickets etc.) , you are forced to use the almighty wechat app. Smartphones are a tool to manipulate and to spy on the population. It is a tool utilized by the ruling class, to control the masses. I hate the future and I hate “progress”.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I honestly think the US is at that point. I need a phone to clock in, you can’t find price checkers anymore, physically paying bills just doesn’t happen anymore, checks are becoming obsolete. Stores are downsizing in favor of online markets, banks are closing lobbies in favor of digital. We love in a digital world and while it’s technically possible without it still, very difficult to do so.

    • Korkki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah and the problem here would be that it all would happen in one app? Seriously? It would only be a problem if google or Microsoft owned and controlled it and ran it rampantly for their own profit, not if it’s handled as a public utility as such things should. That’s why WeChat-like apps are progress and the future.

      • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, centralized applications should never be the future. Of course technology that connects us is the future. But I’d prefer to see a federated system for that, similar to lemmy

        • Korkki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In some applications centralisation is the only feasible solution. Decentralisation and cynical fear of centralisation is never the excuse to create and accept shit.

          • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            We live in the age of information. Data is power. So centralization of data is centralization of power. I prefer the power to be distributed a bit more equally than it is nowadays.

            I agree that sometimes centralization is the only feasible solution. But those cases should be kept to a minimum, regulated and closely monitored