• moonlight@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    And it tells the same time as a $5 Casio, but it’s heavy and gaudy. I guess money can’t buy taste.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      21 hours ago

      And it tells the same time as a $5 Casio

      Assuming the fancy watch is mechanical, your $5 Casio keeps better time with a quartz chip.

      If it’s not mechanical then it’s basically the same device with an expensive shell.

      • el_bhm@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Not entirely true. Quartz mechanisms can differ in precision.

        They also can have solar charging, atomic clock sync, bluethooth

        But mostly true for cheap Casio watches and cheaper lines of G-Shock. They keep the time to a very similar precision.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Barring actual manufacturing defects, the cheapest quartz crystal timing circuit on the market will be far more accurate than the very best Swiss watch movement, by orders of magnitude. A mechanical watch depends on a spring whose behavior is highly environmentally dependent - it will gain or lose multiple seconds per day, being affected by the orientation, vibration and temperature changes it experiences. A quartz watch will drift a few seconds per month.

      • bus_factor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I think mine was a couple hundred bucks. People mistake it for something fancy, but it’s still cheap enough that I don’t have to worry about damaging it. Also you can get spare parts for Casios!