• AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Nah, this blood, as with almost all mass shootings, is completely on the 2A people as far as I’m concerned.

      Australia cleaned up their act in response to mass tragedy. Our society just isn’t a society.

      That would require some degree of cooperation and sacrifice. Modern Americans just don’t have those qualities in us.

      This is what our people have chosen to be.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        We can’t do what Australia did. 2nd Amendment aside (and that alone is a huge blocker), we have a much larger population and a much larger inventory.

        Australia confiscated 650,000 guns on a population at the time of around 18 million people. Even that was only 20% of the guns in the country.

        https://www.vox.com/2015/8/27/9212725/australia-buyback

        The United States has a population over 330 million with over 400 million guns.

        20% of 400 million would be 80 million guns. To take those off the street, we would have to run the equivalent of the Australian program 123 times.

        Logistically, it’s impossible. Even without the 2nd amendment we don’t have the capacity to do it. There’s no way to collect and dispose of them.

        • Lobotomie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Who says this has to be done in a day? Have gun drop off places which keeps lists, destroy the guns (weld the muzzle or drill in a hole both can be done in 2minutes for a single gun) and then sell them to scrapyards. People have time until the end of 2024.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Australian plan did take a year, October 1996 to September 1997, and all they got was 650,000 guns which was 20%.

            Americans first, have no obligation to give up their guns thanks to the 2nd Amendment and second, aren’t as likely to give up their guns.

            You aren’t getting 80 million (20%) even in a year, and again, we don’t have the capacity to collect and dispose of them.

            80 million / 50 (yeah, I know, it won’t be an even distribution, but let’s work the math roughly) 1.6 million per state / 12 months = 133,333 a month per state.

            The Australian plan took 12 months to collect 650,000. So the US would need to meet that in about 5 states in one month.

            The most successful gun buyback in US history collected 4,200 guns across 4 buybacks.

            https://www.hcp1.net/GunBuyback

            The Australian plan cannot work here.

            • User_4272894@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean, you’re throwing out a lot of numbers claiming it is impossible, but we have logistics and resources that Australia didn’t in 1996. If Amazon can deliver 7.7 billion packages a year, and the US can count 150 million votes in a week during election season, we can figure out how to break down 400 million guns over a month, a year, or a decade. It doesn’t have to happen overnight. The “Australian plan” doesn’t have to work here, but getting guns off the street somehow does.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                I guarantee you don’t want a private company like Amazon handling gun confiscation, public policy should not be up to private companies to enforce. Might as well ask people to drop off their guns at the local WalMart and ask untrained staff to deal with them. No good will come from it.

                Elections are a different deal because all you’re processing is bits of paper and data, you aren’t running the risk of, you know, explosive ordinance.

                Even if we had the logistics, which we don’t, there’s still the 2nd amendment to contend with. We can’t force people to give up their guns, that’s a right the Australians didn’t have.

                Repealing the 2nd Amendment can be done, but it starts with 290 votes in the House. You did watch the struggle it took to get the 217 they needed to elect their own leader, right?

                • User_4272894@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I didn’t suggest Amazon run the process. I just meant “logistics infrastructure exists on a scale unimaginable in 1996”. 600 million COVID doses given out in the US might have been a better comparison. Or 7.2 billion packages by USPS in 2022. There are 708k cops in the US. That’s 2 guns recovered per cop per month to have it done in 90 days.

                  There is literally no argument in the world where “the logistics make it impossible” is a reasonable claim.

                  Likewise, “we’ll never get 290 votes” is a lazy and cowardly claim. Yes, it’ll be hard. Yes, it’ll be a fight. Yes, we’ll have some minds that will be impossible to change. But your apparent argument in defense of gun rights seems to be “aww, jeez, it seems pretty tricky” which is truly mind boggling to me.

        • Woht24@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m actually mostly on your side, I think the US is too far gone. If you took peoples guns off them in the US, I genuinely think there would be a or several small civil wars.

          Further a lot of people would just refuse, hide their guns etc.

          If the US actually tried to do what Australia did I think you’d actually see a drop in shootings etc but it would take 50-70 years to actually get through the majority of weapons ‘on the street’.

          But to say it’s logistically impossible is absolutely and completely wrong. It’s culturally near impossible.

          P.s. I’m Australian and our shooting crimes are going up, pistol numbers are going up too and we have the worst self defence laws. I wish I could have a loaded Glock and the right to shoot an intruder in my home honestly.

      • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Our society just isn’t a society.

        Which is why I’d prefer to have a gun

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget the day before he killed people that this was “a good guy with a gun”

    • jennwiththesea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They need a red flag/extreme risk protection order (ERPO) law in their state, at the very least. If used, such a law could have prevented this. It’s one of the things that Moms Demand Action has been pushing for.

      • crashoverride@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As soon as someone comes in with HI/SI that should trigger a response that removes all weapons from someone’s home, a 72 hr psych hold, and informs all immediate friends/family that they are not to be allowed near guns/knives. Period

  • PorradaVFR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Of course he could have done that step first but instead another damaged and armed asshole imposes his demons on others and inflicts grievous pain on dozens of families before offing themself.

    Yet another in a long list of isolated incidents because after trying nothing we’ve run out of ideas.

    • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not like we’ve tried nothing; he should have been dealt with when he made threats, but the police don’t want to act on the laws we have in place. They want to wait until a tragedy happens so they can feel like they’re being heroes, apparently.

  • bmsok@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The US has both a gun problem AND a mental health problem. We need more immediate access to long term healthcare.

    The addition of the 988 hotline is an ok start but mental health issues are still demonized and have limited resources.

    Tragic underfunding + stigma = tragedies

    Everyone check in on your friends and loved ones, too.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We need universal mental health care full stop. Even if you’re against universal health care in general, and I don’t know why anyone would be, start with universal mental health care.

      Get people assessed, get them the treatment they need. If they need to be held the rest of their lives, figure out how to make that work safely and humanely.

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      the hotline is a copout to help people ignore the systemic problems fueling depression epidemic

      • bmsok@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh the whole thing is definitely a broader socioeconomic and societal issue, for sure. That’s why it’s a crisis line and not a therapy line.

    • crashoverride@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But let’s be clear here, this guy did not do these things because he had a mental health problem. Dude had a plan, a really complex one, and had extensive training in the army to carry a plan out like this , to avoid being captured and to cause as much damage as possible. If he was just suicidal, he would have just offed himself instead of 22 plus other casualties he caused. Do not blame on what he did on his mental health problem and failure to get it sorted

      I blame it on society as a whole, the failure to take away his guns whenever he checked into a mental health place, and for failure to take care of his veterans.

        • crashoverride@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Had problems with an ex, some old friends, and it looks like he was fired recently from a job. Wanted revenge I guess.

          • bmsok@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, that’s sort of exactly why everyone needs someone to talk to and process stuff. If you’ve lost a relationship, friends, and a job you should be able to access care when you start having dark thoughts like this.

            • crashoverride@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Exactly, small things that build up can lead to tragedy. Especially when you’re mentally unstable to begin with. What happened with him was horrible and tragic, but not totally his fault. Society has some blame to take too because they let him out of that facility without a support system in place and they didn’t take his guns. Two things they should have done. In addition to help and support we also need trigger laws that take all your guns and other weapons, and inform your family and friends that this person is not allowed to have guns, and closely monitor his financials to see if he’s trying to buy a gun. Any ONE of those would have prevented what happened in Lewiston.

  • eran_morad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s be real. The only way this stops is when enough republicunt politicians see their own children murdered in such incidents.

  • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Time for the usual political debate to run it’s course and nothing to happen, because any change to the conditions that generate this violence run against capital interests.