Kyrsten Sinema doesn’t care one bit if she wins re-election, according to a new book.

“I can go on any board I want to. I can be a college president. I can do anything,” she said.

Sinema told Romney said she saved the filibuster and the Senate and that’s “good enough for me.”

  • Thunderbird4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    doesn’t care one bit if she wins re-election

    = Fuck you

    “I can go on any board I want to.”

    = I got mine

    What a lovely sentiment from a public servant.

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This asshole cares more about her post-Senate media career than doing the right thing by her constituents.

    Everyone saw her cute little thumbs-down to paying people a living wage; she shouldn’t earn one either. Unfortunately the corporate media loves “moderates” like Sinema, so I guarantee she’ll get a cozy gig from MSNBC or FOX.

    • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the interests fairness sinema wasn’t directly quoted saying this. From the article:

      According to reporter McKay Coppins’s new book, “Romney: A Reckoning,” Sinema once told Republican Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah that she could “do anything” once she’s out of office and feels that what she’s done in the Senate is “good enough.”

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        So the “quote” in the title isn’t even hers, but a paraphrasing in first person? That’s grade A bullshit.

    • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Her and manchin publicly argue that getting rid of the filibuster would allow republicans to gut the social safety net when/if they take control of government. I think that’s a bad argument though because there’s always another election and if Republicans did do that then votes could put Democrats back in power to restore and/or improve everything.

      • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess we could flip flop on stuff like that but the folks screwed over during the interim are going to have a really bad time.

        Of course that’s also assuming some Democrats aren’t convinced (💰) to go along and we never get these program back. And if we do then we lose them again when the Republicans manage to up their voter suppression & gerrymandering game.

        • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We’re at a point where nothing gets accomplished at all. This graph illustrates how common it is to obstruct legislation, appointments, etc now.

  • Ænima@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought we had “revolving door” policies at the federal level. Maybe that’s something we need to have, like a lot of other things.

    • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      My understanding is that they’re are no limitations on members of Congress after they leave office. Trump did put a ban on people on his administration becoming lobbyists, I think it was a five year ban, but he rescinded it towards the end of his term.