cm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 3 个月前Violencelemmy.mlimagemessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up11.14Karrow-down181cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.06Karrow-down1imageViolencelemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 3 个月前message-square117fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareSaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up23·2 个月前Can’t discuss a fascist away, but you can get rid of him by violent means. Violence is sometimes morally acceptable if not outright required even.
minus-squareSlam_Eye@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 个月前Who has the moral authority to decide when or when not to use violence?
minus-squareBgugi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 个月前Usually whoever has the most accumulated violence. History is written…
minus-squarescratchee@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前Moral authority is always dubious, violence or not.
Can’t discuss a fascist away, but you can get rid of him by violent means. Violence is sometimes morally acceptable if not outright required even.
Who has the moral authority to decide when or when not to use violence?
Usually whoever has the most accumulated violence. History is written…
Moral authority is always dubious, violence or not.