cm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 months agoViolencelemmy.mlimagemessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up11.14Karrow-down181cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.06Karrow-down1imageViolencelemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square117fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareSaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up23·2 months agoCan’t discuss a fascist away, but you can get rid of him by violent means. Violence is sometimes morally acceptable if not outright required even.
minus-squareSlam_Eye@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoWho has the moral authority to decide when or when not to use violence?
minus-squareBgugi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoUsually whoever has the most accumulated violence. History is written…
minus-squarescratchee@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoMoral authority is always dubious, violence or not.
Can’t discuss a fascist away, but you can get rid of him by violent means. Violence is sometimes morally acceptable if not outright required even.
Who has the moral authority to decide when or when not to use violence?
Usually whoever has the most accumulated violence. History is written…
Moral authority is always dubious, violence or not.