FTC lays out new rule that could end hidden fees | The agency is proposing a new rule that could require businesses, from hotels to ticket sellers, to provide clear disclosures on costs and whether…::The US Federal Trade Commission is proposing a new rule known as the Trade Regulation Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees that it hopes will stop businesses from charging consumers hidden fees.

  • eric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey FTC: let’s have the govt set the example here and include sales tax in this rule. It is also a bullshit hidden fee, and there’s no reason we shouldn’t include it in the sticker price. You already require it to be included for gasoline, so why only gasoline?

      • eric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why would the oil lobby want tax to be included gasoline? The added transparency only raises the sticker price which reduces sales.

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The added transparency only increases sales because people will buy cars knowing that listed price is what they are going to pay for gasoline.

          • eric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It seems quite the stretch to think people would buy more cars because tax is included in the price of gasoline. Please provide some data that substantiates your theory.

            • uis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It seems quite the stretch to think people would buy more cars because tax is included in the price of gasoline.

              In what shop would you go? In one that charges listed price or one that charges more?

              • eric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Most people would go to the one with the cheaper posted price but with hidden fees than the one with the more expensive all inclusive price. Market data shows this tactic works, and the fact of the matter is that people are consistently fooled into paying higher prices because of hidden fees.

                Why else would most companies consistently hide fees rather than be transparent unless it positively affects their bottom line?

  • valek879@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hopefully this will include groceries. I hate when I go to buy something and it says $9.99 and I get up to the register and they hit me with this stupid, obnoxious hidden fee!

    I only have a $10 bill, it says it costs less then $10. Why is it not false advertising to have it say $9.99 when it costs $12.37 at the register?

    The whole thing is a scam.

    • gothicdecadence@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I heard someone say they don’t like coming to America because it feels like everything is trying to scam you at once and honestly yeah

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        at least in the US pricing is somewhat consistent. Sticker price + local tax, which isn’t going to change shop to shop, just state to state or within city limits. If you go to China or the Middle East the “sticker price” is bogus and you’re expected to haggle with the merchant in many places.

        • gothicdecadence@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, haggle culture and the lack of it both have their pros and cons. Can’t really tell Walmart about an unexpected expense that came up and have them feel sympathy to lower the price lol. But also haggling for everything must be tiring. It’s also tiring feeling like I have no power over prices though, so yeah, pros and cons.

          • danque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            As someone with social anxiety, haggling for a better price is my worst social nightmare. It would only benefit those with a large mouth even though the sales employee is objected with selling the highest price. Better go for competitive pricing that atleast is fair for both parties.

      • danque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it was designed that way. In other countries its far more simple to implement.

        • phillaholic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, but you’re talking about potentially changing how 13,000 Jurisdictions structure their taxes. Not an easy under taking.

  • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is yet another proposal to end hidden fees that does nothing to medical billing, the single largest source of hidden fees.

  • TheLameSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looking forward to this, my partners best friend helped pen this rule so it’s been a hot topic in the house for quite a while.