Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoSquare!lemmy.zipimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down10
arrow-up19arrow-down1imageSquare!lemmy.zipMaven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 year agoWell then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost two right angles to the contiguous void.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoWhy? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoWithout a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
minus-squareKlear@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 year agoFun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so that checks out.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·8 months agoun cub, une cube ;)
Well then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost two right angles to the contiguous void.
Why? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
Without a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
Fun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so that checks out.
Ceci n’est pas une cube.
un* cube
un cub, une cube ;)