• Ejh3k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    About a decade ago or so, I found myself in a reddit argument with someone that claimed they had never attempted to plug a USB in unsuccessfully. They said that every single time they’ve plugged in, it was the correct way. Some people are insane.

    • hcbxzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Perhaps a controversial opinion here, but the usefulness of reversibility is vastly overrated. It’s not a game changer, just a tiny first-world luxury that’s nice to have, but it does it by introducing a bunch of unnecessary complexity that I’d rather avoid. Not worth the trade off IMO. I can count on one hand the number of minutes USB-C has saved me by being reversible and I honestly don’t care

      • Ejh3k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m happier with how long usb c last before they start getting finicky than I am the reversiblity.

        • hcbxzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In theory, USB-C should be better, but in practice, the quality control is all over the place.

          All of my micro USB cables and ports have lasted just fine. I used one daily with my phone for 10+ years with no issues, and I’ve only had maybe two cables ever actually fail. Meanwhile, I’ve already had at least 5 USB-C cables or dongles that have fully failed, and plus the primary USB-C charging port on a laptop just completely die. I wish it was better, but it just isn’t.

          Also if USB-C was just replacing just micro USB I’d be ok with that. But the problem is they’re also replacing USB-A, and Type C is not nearly as durable as Type A since it’s so small, it’s just physically impossible. I wish they made a larger version of the Type C port. Same shape, same pins, just bigger in every dimension. As large as Type A, for durability.

          I’m not a big fan of Apple, but the lightning connector is just better, physically. It’s way more durable in practice since it’s just a solid piece. I wish USB-C was designed that way instead of what we actually got.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The issue is that USBC was the first standard to really take the mechanical design process seriously in a consumer context. In doing so, it was made both way more ergonomic and way more durable. I’d argue that without the focus on some of these “small but marketable” consumer-oriented bits, we would not have gotten the great overall connector design we did.

        • hcbxzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not a big fan of Apple, but the lightning connector is just better, physically. It’s way more durable in practice since it’s just a solid piece. I wish USB-C was designed that way instead of what we actually got.

          • owatnext@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            If I recall correctly, Lightning connectors are designed in a way that makes the port more likely to wear out. USB-C is designed in a way that makes the cable more likely to wear out. I would rather replace my $5 charging cable than replace my $150 (or more!) phone.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am just laughing here because I spent the day dealing with ancient serial tech pigtails and DB9s. You people have no idea the pain of losing multiple days of your life trying to get RS-232 to work. Especially when stuff doesn’t follow the standards it is supposed to follow.

    • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well if you only plugged one USB in your life you have a 50% chance of never having plugged it in wrong.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That person is either a flat out liar, or they are incredibly anal and waste a lot of time looking at the connector and input every single time they connect a cable.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t really have a problem looking at the connector before plugging it in. I thought this was an overblown meme.

    • anlumo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you can see through the two rectangular cutouts on the plug, it’s the right way around. Unfortunately, this doesn’t help if the plug is turned 90°, and also some computers have it upside down (looking at you, GPD).

    • Ibex0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder how that redditor is doing now? Still batting 1.000 with USB A adapters?

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it’s on a laptop I could see it. The empty half almost always needs to be on top on the male side because the female end is almost always plastic on top.