The conversations are amazing

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Are they better, though?

      I mean, last I checked, Wikipedia is far more accurate than most encyclopedias professionally assembled. And, to add to it: Wikipedia is certainly well sourced, and admits its biases quite openly, and in fact are working to correct those biases.

      So, what Chinese-based wikipedia alternatives are out there? And I mean, communally owned, maintained, and edited encyclopedia, which, quite frankly, is one of the best examples of a communist endeavors one can find on the internet at this time…

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I mean, last I checked

        Lol, what do you mean “checked”? You’re just assuming its accurate based on your pre-existing biases.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’m assuming it’s still as accurate as the data previously showed, and because I’m an active editor there, who works quite hard to ensure what I edit is reliably sourced.