Wendy’s and McDonald’s have emerged victorious from a lawsuit that accused the fast food chains of false advertising.

A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit brought against the two companies accusing them of selling smaller hamburgers than advertised and alleging the food didn’t look as appetizing in person as pictured on their websites.

  • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only because ‘everyone does it’

    "US District Judge Hector Gonzalez ruled that Wendy’s and McDonald’s food images “are no different than other companies’ use of visually appealing images to foster positive associations with their products.”

    Italics mine

    • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ahh yes the rarely used “jump off a bridge reversal” defense. If everyone jumped off a bridge would you do it too? Of course!

      • zerofk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        At the very least I’d start checking for a monster chasing them off the bridge.

    • quindraco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you replace your underscores with asterisks, emphasis/italics should work as intended.

    • pips@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not really, that’s a minor part of the opinion. The more important part is they tell you how much food you’re going to get of what kind and then they give you that food. I don’t think anyone would be able to win a case on “my burger didn’t look like the burger in the ad” because every burger looks a little different. Lots of things that are the same don’t look the same and let’s not suddenly pretend we get McDonalds for the appearance. They’d win false advertising if, say, a quarter pounder was only 2 oz.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lots of things that are the same don’t look the same

        …and that’s false advertising, that’s the point of the lawsuit.

      • sock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        yeah this lawsuit is stupid and anyone who thinks McDonald’s would lose is also stupid

        have we forgotten what advertising is? its idealized, its artificial, its eye-catching. thats the point. like the suit says everyone does it, thats just good marketing.

        frankly i think it makes commericals a bit more tolerable if theyre at least aesthetically pleasing. but marketers marketing in a system that requires advertising for anyone to be relevant cannot be infringed on for just two companies doing the marketing the exact same. blame capitalism for ads not the companies.

        (unless we’re taking excessive ads on websites or whatever then blame the sites they’re just greedy)

          • sock@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            what is the line then

            how bout this. we ban ALL film. cameras are no longer allowed and any sort of media should be burned as its all idealized and any picture of anything wont look like a picture of something else therefore all media should be banned due to false advertising.

            wait that doesnt make any sense. youre not gonna take a shitty video of yourself and post it online youre gonna take a bunch of attempts so it looks better than you actually are. that’s marketing its no different that a company is doing it. therefore if you want to be angry at a company “false advertising” then be mad at every picture in existence too.

            try to at least be consistent with your cynicism. dont judge others based on their actions if youre gonna judge yourself only based on your circumstance.

  • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    America proves once again that we will allow just about anything if it makes corpos money.

  • Shazbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The advertising angle is likely what sank their case. Proving the food does not meet a technical specification, like not having a quarter pound of beef in a fully cooked patty, is easier to prove. But advertising has always been hyperbole.

    • 2ncs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      A very important aspect that I think people overlook is that they use similar/same marketing photos of the food on their menu. That’s not advertising, maybe that’s what they will argue. If I look at a menu and they have a picture of the food, I’m going to expect I get what I see (within a margin) vs when I see an advertisement I expect it to be a bit hyperbolic.

  • alienanimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The law favors corporate giants rather than real people? How surprising. Fuck McDonalds and Wendys

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll never understand the Wendy’s fandom. I knew a couple other people who were the same. The only fast food they would eat was Wendy’s. I don’t get it. It’s not like they do anything unique or different from any other fast food restaurant. Please explain yourself.

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now, just to add more shit to that sandwich, remember what you said when you read that the Supreme Court has ruled several times that police officers ONLY duty is to uphold the law, and they have no duty or obligation to protect the citizens they police.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Case dismissed”

    The judge said through a mouth full of big mac before banging his gavel and taking a completely unrelated briefcase full of money that the defendants just happened leave around.

  • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “This is so backwards” one would think and then one realizes that all advertising is deception.

    The judge tacitly acknowledges this truth.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah yes, if only we did this one easy thing! It so easy!

      If it was that easy/simple they would be out of business already. Unfortunately reality doesn’t always line up with these “simple” solutions, as evidence by… reality.

      • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        IDK, I stopped going to McDonald’s and Wendy’s: So far it’s going great and their misleading ads no longer affect me.