• nroth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Though the image generators are actually good. The visual arts will never be the same after this

    • TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I’ve been thinking about this a lot recently. No, we’re not there yet, may never be. Compare what Jesar, one of my favorite artists, can do - and that was in the oh-so-long-ago 2000s - and what an AI can do. It’s simply not up to the task. I do use AI a lot to create what is basically utility art. But it depends on pre-defined textual or visual inputs whereas only an artist can have divine inspiration. AI is more of a sterile tool, like interactive clipart, if you will.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Compare it to the microwave. Is it good at something, yes. But if you shoot your fucking turkey in it at Thanksgiving and expect good results, you’re ignorant of how it works. Most people are expecting language models to do shit that aren’t meant to. Most of it isn’t new technology but old tech that people slapped a label on as well. I wasn’t playing Soul Caliber on the Dreamcast against AI openents… Yet now they are called AI opponents with no requirements to be different. GoldenEye on N64 was man VS AI. Madden 1995… AI. “Where did this AI boom come from!”

      Marketing and mislabeling. Online classes, call it AI. Photo editors, call it AI.