• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Isn’t it good that the money is being put back into circulation instead of being hoarded? I’m all in for the wealthy wasting their money.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1121 days ago

      I’m willing to bet the vast majority of that money is changing hands among tech companies like Intel, AMD, nVidia, AWS, etc. Only a small percentage would go to salaries, etc. and I doubt those rates have changed much…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      821 days ago

      Yeah, the brightest minds instead of building useful tech to fight climate change, spend their life building vanity AI projects. Computational resources instead of folding proteins or whatever are wasted on some gradient descent of some useless model.

      All while working class wages are stagnant. And so your best career advice is to go get a random tech degree so you could also work on vanity stuff and make money.

      This is cryptocurrency equivalent. It’s worse than CEOs buying yachts. The latter actually leads to some innovation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 days ago

        Succesfully creating an actual AGI would be by far the biggest and most significant invention in the human history so I can’t blame them for trying.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          320 days ago

          A bunch of people fine-tuning an off-the-shelf model on a proprietary task only to fail horrendously will never lead to any progress, let alone AGI.

          So, nobody is trying AGI.

          If all those people would actually collectively work on a large-scale research project, we’d see humanity advance. But that’s exactly my point.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            “Nobody is trying AGI” is simply just not true. If you think what they’re doing will never lead to AGI, then that’s an opinion you’re free to have, but it’s still just that; an opinion. Our current LLM’s are by far the closest resemblance of AGI that we’ve ever seen. That route may very well be a dead end but it may also not be. You can’t know that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              120 days ago

              Oh gosh, look, an AI believer.

              No, LLM will not lead to AGI. But even if they did, applying existing tech to a new problem only to fail cuz you’re dumb at estimating the complexity does not, in fact, improve the underlying technology.

              To paraphrase in a historical context: no matter how many people run around with shovels digging the ground for something, it will never lead to an invention of the excavator.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                20 days ago

                Ad hominem and circular reasoning isn’t a valid counter-argument. You’re not even attempting to convince me otherwise, you’re just being a jerk.

    • finley
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Kinda, but it’s like feeding a starving child nothing but candy until they die.

      ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      321 days ago

      Thats a “Parable of the Broken Window”. They could be spending their money on something actually useful.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        320 days ago

        But they probably wouldn’t, they’d just throw it at gold, crypto, or something else that doesn’t provide any real value.