• 2 Posts
  • 36 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 3rd, 2024

help-circle


  • I mean it sure would do more than pretending it’s not happening - but I get it - most Germans preferred to pretend they couldn’t smell the smoke either.

    And again you don’t even have to risk your own safety by protesting - you could at least join a local community organizing group to help people most affected.

    I’m sure you may think one person can’t make a difference but I can guarantee that even a single person more that’s helping out with mutual aid would be met with appreciation anywhere. Still good on you for financing charities - that is usually the very first step.

    Also this isn’t a sprint - it’s a marathon - expecting protests now to have any immediate impact is just setting you up for failure - these fights have been fought for generations - so lock in and get ready to resist not just these 4 but the next 40 years.

    And sorry if this feels overwhelming and you don’t think you have the capacity - but even doing 1 day of volunteering a month is a good starting point.





  • zeezee@slrpnk.netOPtoMemes@lemmy.mlyea...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    denied was implied by comparing musk’s salute to that of the pope waving his arm - but fair, she didn’t outright say it

    still the timing is most definitely not coincidental - but I can see how that can seem that way if you didn’t browse xitter when it happened


  • zeezee@slrpnk.netOPtoMemes@lemmy.mlyea...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    her tweet was made a day after musk’s salute and consequent “funny” nazi puns - alongside posts denying the salute as sincere, therefore enabling nazi normalization

    the issue isn’t if JK is a swastika waving nazi - she most likely isn’t - the issue is she’s siding with fascists because they share the same hateful rhetoric and is willing to defend and normalize their behavior because she sees them as allies and the “woke leftists” as the enemy.


  • zeezee@slrpnk.netOPtoMemes@lemmy.mlyea...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    we couldn’t agree on an illustrator. He wanted Eva Braun, but the sample sketches he showed me were shit.

    If he wanted Eva Braun to be the illustrator why would he show JK his own sketches and not hers? Why even mention Eva at that point?

    Idk but imma head out as I don’t have the energy to dissect a poorly written attempt at a joke by a known nazi apologist…


  • zeezee@slrpnk.netOPtoMemes@lemmy.mlyea...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I mean Eva Braun was a photographer so not sure why her sketches would have been good? But I guess she was trying to shoehorn hitler being a bad artist but just didn’t know how to tie it in?

    Call be old-fashioned but I prefer my jokes to be funny because they’re clever not because “haha hitler couldn’t draw amirite”









  • A-are you actually comparing Elvis conspiracies with racial supremacy? Sounds like your logic doesn’t go further than “freedom of speech = good”

    You say rights exist until they encroach on others’ freedoms. But promoting ideas of racial supremacy directly encroaches on others’ basic freedoms and safety. By your own logic, those views forfeit their protection.

    You argue it’s important to demonstrate opposition to harmful views. That’s exactly what content moderation is - society collectively demonstrating opposition to ideas that threaten democratic values and human dignity.

    You claim repression breeds hate and echo chambers. But platforming hate speech (by claiming they’re something to be “debated”) creates echo chambers of hatred and drives away the very people you claim should be engaging in debate. Your approach actually reduces genuine dialogue.

    You reference people being killed for scientific beliefs. But you’re comparing the persecution of evidence-based scientific inquiry to the restriction of propaganda designed to harm others. These aren’t remotely equivalent - you’re actually trivializing historical persecution.

    You’re basically saying “we must protect Alice’s right to a safe home by platforming Bob’s right to debate burning it down.”

    Also your whole “But people who know better are also free to debate them - and prove them wrong” - completely disregards the physical reality of the burden of proof - it takes 0 effort to say “yggstyle hates people of color and that’s why they argue for people to have the freedom to say anything” - and now it’s on you to prove me wrong - but every time you spend time trying I’ll just claim a new ridiculous thing - absolute “freedom of speech” is a godsend for bad faith actors.

    I hope you can see why this rhetoric is bullshit and why people should not support anybody’s “freedom of speech” to debate people’s rights to exist.




  • This doesn’t need to turn into a pissing contest as I see you care about the Palestinian cause.

    I too have spent countless hours protesting on the ground, being threatened and followed by police, helping comrades deal with the abysmal legal system and some other things I don’t feel comfortable admitting on a public forum - but I don’t see this as justification to blame others for the voting choices they’ve made - I’ve used my privilege to help as much as I can - not because that allows me to “berate people on the internet for not caring as much” but because it’s the only thing that helps me sleep at night.

    I’m glad you’re involved in the cause - I just wanted to highlight how we should have class solidarity against the ruling class and not divide ourselves based on who’s not voted for whom as if that’s what makes it or breaks it.