I did that in my communications to their support staff.
I’ve also attempted to contact their legal dept directly with no luck.
grow a plant, hug your dog, lift heavy, eat healthy, be a nerd, play a game and help each other out
I did that in my communications to their support staff.
I’ve also attempted to contact their legal dept directly with no luck.
Maybe it was some sort of federation issue?
I was a little confused by the tone of this one. I scrolled back up and realised it was written by Signal’s Meredith Whittaker, and it made a bit more sense.
I see, good to know. There’s always potential for that. I suppose we’ll see in the coming weeks.
I suppose there’s a chance but it’s not even my main payment method. I primarily use an entirely different card from a different vendor for the majority of my purchases today.
I’m also wondering what a fraudulent customer would need to do to warrant a test charge. I can’t think of anything an end user would do to invoke an attempt of $0.00 on their first transaction with my details.
Appreciate the information. An associate of mine did allude to this being the case, key thing is they’ve attempted a transaction on this payment method and I’ve told them to stop.
I thought about that, but it’s an entirely new card. Even if they had the AN, SC, Card number, they’d still need the new expiry date and security number. I don’t think these are required for business, however.
Yup, reported this to the ICO two days ago.
I suppose I did want to find out if it happened to other people ahead of reaching out, but it can take up to 15 weeks for a case to get looked at, so I figured I’d send it asap.
I neglected to mention in the post that I’ve already reached out to the ICO. Appreciate you linking this here for others in the UK who have dealt with the same thing though
That’s why we have the ICO here in the UK (and similar government bodies across Europe)
As mentioned near the top, I preusme this was an automated test charge to check the validity of the payment method
lmao
Thanks for the input. I wonder if you were amongst the first few people to delete their account in response to the controversy.
In the back of my mind, I feel the same way, but at least they can be fined for infractions like this.
Appreciate the sentiment nonetheless
Hawk Point APUs (8000 series) perhaps
The key theme I see associated with UE5 and bundled technogies like nanite is acutely poor in-game performance
You’re in for a great time. enjoy 😊
I’ve reached out to the ICO, hadn’t thought about it but I suppose I could try MS legal as well. Good idea