They weren’t already part of it? I doubt that!

Lab grown diamonds are actually flawless, so the jewellery industry represents them as being too perfect. Apparently you need the imperfections that natural diamonds have in order to have ‘character’ and therfore value!

Oh, but being a single mother at that age is great for career prospects yeah? Young fathers have as much responsibility towards their children as young mothers - saying that 30% of income is too much to pay? Wtf? How much of her income is the mother expected to pay to support her child?

I’ve heard all I need to hear from you - you are trying to claim that the current genocide is justified based on the potential genocide that could happen if Israel doesn’t completely exterminate Palestine. It’s a bullshit argument, I’ve heard it before, it’s insulting.

Yet here you are, trying to justify genocide.

There is no video that will make me agree with genocide, and to try is insulting.

No, that’s the sweet part - everyone and everything can now be designated ‘anti-fa’ as the state desires!

See, gravy is so easy - meat juice, stock, bit of balsamic - I think how can you fuck this up? Then you get gravy litteraly in any commercial setting, and… urgh…

MAGA youth?

Yeah, i ised take out before, it took 2 weeks to download my photos, i think 8 60gb downloads. It was painful, I got hopeful that youbhad discovered a workaround.

How is this served? Do they send a usb drive? Or a download link of some sort?

Penn and Teller did it…

This is a good idea - get the young fit and healthy. Could send them to camps where they learn about health and fitness, maybe even practical outdoor skills as well. We coukd call it something like l The ‘Trump Youth’!

Which it kimd of does. News on the arrests and progress of the prosecution is keeping this in the news cycle way longer than the original protest.

The point is to protest the law, as well as the genocide.

Now BOE just needs to sell the technology to their completely independent wholly owned subsidiary, COE…

Noooooo! I’m shocked!

Can’t wait to see what the “panels thst that offer context about it’s history” will say…

Well dont I look the fool. I’m pissed off now, I didn’t watch the video. Inhave seen like 3 where tthisnsame judge throws out the case based on an illigal stop. Ill find them tomorrow. As to yoir question, you keep leaving oit the illigal part. Yes, not providing ID is an offence if the initial stop is legal. Now you are again correct, the officer does claim that the driver wasn’t wearing a seat belt, so I suppose the initial stop can be justified, which makes refusing to ID an offence.

Well, I watch the video when it camentonlohht a fewndays ago, I don’t remember anything about the aeatbelt. But the reason the officer gave to the driver was driving without headlights in inclement weather, which would only be a violation if the weather were inclement, which it wasn’t, and the driver states that. The officer doesn’t get to change his mind as to the reason for the stop, thats well established in law.

As to physically resisting, the driver did not physically resist, he passively resisted, refusing to unlock the car door andnexit the vehicle. He didn’t at any point lay hands on the officers.

A stop where the initial stop was deemed unconstitutional: Here’s one . The first one on YouTube. I admit I haven’t watched this one, but then same judge is on YouTube presiding over dozens of similar cases, and there are many other similar videos.