facism. This is the same stuff the actual nazia did.

But don’t actually call them Nazis, you’ll have very normal people responding to you that they can’t be Nazis because they’re not actively running gas chambers or invading Poland or some nonsense.

I weep for the historical literacy of this country. So many will argue about what to call these shitheads while they slowly work their way through the ‘undesirables’ until they get to people they care about. It’s like that old poem:

“At first they came for the Latinos and gays, but I didn’t say anything because we have to tone police monikers until we’re at the hight of the barbarity.”

Or something, idk.

I’ll concede the first 2 points, but I’ll argue the 3rd.

Calling modern politicians Nazis is intellectually lazy and counterproductive to achieving anything.

Ok, what moniker would you use for fascists that want to deport/kill minorities and put them into camps? Authoritarians who pander to the common people and tell them about all the socialist policies they plan to enact during the election, then immediately give up the lie and say they are just going to do authoritarian things and start rounding up minorities and persecuting sexual minorities? Fascist works, but it doesn’t really fully encompass what they’re about.

If only there was a shorthand moniker for authoritarians who run on nationalism and socialism together… Like, some kind of National Socialism. Though, these ones are also “Christians”, so they can be the National Christians. We could abbreviate it Nat-C too.

The problem presents when the average goes down.

I’m not appreciably smarter than I was a decade ago, but the average person appears to have been collecting head injuries in that time it would seem.

All those positives on there, and shit like trump is a bad person but a good president. Counter points:

1, can you really be a good president if you’re a bad person?

2, you can’t be a good president when you’re actively trying to subvert the constitution.

3, Nazis can’t be good at much other than spreading hate and pain.

Does it count as ‘weirdly aggressive’ that I had a comment removed for an unsourced quotation? Because I was quoting the person I was responding to, directly in the comment I was replying to.

AIBros have to come up with anything to downplay how awful their waifu is.

This is the kind of gang violence I can get behind

Are you planning on removing the molten batteries from the truck? Something tells me burying* the whole truck is the easier and safer course of action.

Because suffering and fear is the point

You have to pay a some point.

Someone has to pay for it, not necessarily you. You can get all kinds of blood, sometimes even consensually!

Same, and I also thought Kamala would win because our voters couldn’t possibly be dumb enough to elect the dipshit fascist again after how badly it went the first time and how he was talking about all the awful shit he’d do.

I was wrong to put any faith in my fellow citizens, clearly.

Wait, their fuckin coffee TALKS!!?!

Or just plain old fashioned engagement baiting.

ISO 8601 is clearly much superior due to being delimited.

deleted by creator

Same, though the nice thing about being in a (largish) polycule is that someone gets tested every few months

That’s only because they don’t have the religious law in place yet.

Lol, you don’t have to be celibate to be willfully childless. I have plenty of friends that got the snip/knot before having a kid because they don’t want one. And they are some of the sluttiest motherfuckers I know (and they’d take that as the compliment it was).

One of my partners squirts like a fountain, and we just put a towel or 3 down to catch it so she doesn’t have to sleep in a wetspot

I just find the non sealed end and make the pspspspsp (cat call) finger motion and it opens up well enough when I have to use the bags