So you would be happier getting abused by authoritarian regimes in North Korea, for example? Weird flex but okay.
So you would be happier getting abused by authoritarian regimes in North Korea, for example? Weird flex but okay.
Yes, those are definitely the best places to live. Especially compared to ugly capitalists states such as luxembourg or switzerland.
If US is the biggest obstacle to communism worldwide, then god bless america lol
Those advantages of women they have compared to men are literally nothing compared to the advantages men have. Here is an example where sisters Williams tried to beat ~350 man in world rankings and it just didn’t go well: https://www.tennisnow.com/Blogs/NET-POSTS/November-2017-(1)/The-Man-Who-Beat-Venus-and-Serena-Back-to-Back.aspx
Same for other sports. I used to to skiing and in junior leagues, men were seconds ahead of women on the same track.
Cmon… Imposing tariffs on your allies is not the way you build economy.
fucking finally
Having an engineering degree and still wanting to move to a country which does not respect basic human rights and which tries to pursue communism is a very interesting combination indeed.
Well, obviously every attempt at communism results in a dictatorship. To achieve communism, you firstly need a dictatorship but since it’s impossible to achieve communism, you will end up with socialist dictatorship. That’s why it sucks.
Yes, it’s done with tax money, so it’s not free.
If you promise to stay there, I will buy you a one way ticket. Thanks
Yes, USSR became a superpower where most areas were without toilets…
Will you develop medicine for free? Will you do 8+ hour long surgeries for free? Will you teach children at school for free?
Nothing is free, buddy. If sth appears to be free, it’s only because someone sponsors it.
Okay, move to Cuba or North Korea where they still try to pursue communism and where they still have not realized how broken system it is. You will surely enjoy life there :D
Why not. Maybe I would cap it at some number of elections.
Elon?
I think he should start with burning himself
So if I have a small computer repair store and want to make it more successful, I should employ at least million people, so the ratio goes up?
Company is not a charity. There is a difference.
Suppose that dropbox employs twice as many people as other cloud providers. Would you be willing to pay them the twice amount for the same product the competition offers just because they employ more people?
You know, we live in the world of competition where you need to be ahead your rivals, otherwise your company fails (and all employees lose their jobs). So cutting costs where it’s possible makes perfect sense, especially if the employees can be replaced by computers or sth.
Well, if dropbox can exist without those 500 employees, then it’s logical. You don’t judge success of a business by how many people it employs
It indeed doesn’t work. Has been tried countless times. Whole eastern europe, North Korea, China and many more countries. It failed every single time because communism is a fundamentally broken system.
And please, don’t try to convince me that communism in the eastern bloc failed due to US.