But they’re not a problem everywhere, they’re a problem of containment at the manufacturer.
So screw the local environment and the people that live there? If the manufacturer could capture and destroy pfoa’s before release, why havent they done so? If they could and didnt, then they brought the ban unpon themselves.
This is like arguing “oh, but the oil spill was in a remote part of the ocean and would never effect my house, so keep on drilling baby!”
Abestos was used for millenias, and was known the miners a thousands years ago would succumb to a mysterious illness after working years in the mines… and it was just banned in the US in checks notes. Last year. Must’ve been big fiberglass behind it!
Funny how i was the only one to back my statements with sources.
How many adolescent gangs and drug dealers do you know?
Not even an argument. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10682938/
Most shootings have been done with ‘handguns’ which has seen little regulations from the fed.
Guns were even more accessible years prior. So thats not the complete answer.
If you aim to make significant profit with it. Yes. Otherwise i had nothing to lose to begin with.
Depriving owed earnings is also considered theft.
I mean, so is not doing anything… wait i better not give them any ideas.
Must be nice to have privilege to just leave. Most countries have strict immigration policy that most amercians wont even qualify for.
I mean, sure. Not every single calorie you consumed gets absorbed and expelled. Fiber has tons of calories, but our bodies cant digest it so its simply expelled. Its very naunce argument. Thats why i selectively said “enegry dense food” sugars and fats are easily broken down and absorbed. I was not intending you to interpret it as meaning if you eat a gram of uranium, that your body would suddenly gain 18 million calories.
Its both. Calorie in. Calorie out. Any calories not used will be stored for later. Keep consuming more than used, than more and more gets stored. The problem with modern diets is food is very enegry dense and a lot of people dont live active lives. Our bodies have not adapted to such lifestyles. Its adapted to survive until the next hunt not the next doordash delivery.
Implying the line would stop at the town and not carry on to the next. Also, how much is being spent on building and maintaining freeways?
You’d be suprised how many people commute more than an hour by car. The prospect of having affordable housing with more job opportunities will certainly bring in more people.
They are just very short sighted. Just lobby to have a station and a have commuter stops and people will flock to those “cheaper” areas to live bringing in tons of tax revenue and boosting the local economy.
“Dont mind me officer, Im just training my (brain) model”
I did. Doesnt mean you made any sense. Any direction from Antarctica is north no matter what perspective.
Let me guess, you think earth is flat cause maps are flat.
“we must make america great again. The woke mob has stolen our beautiful burning rivers. We aim to bring them back bigger and better!”
Right… like how hard is it not crash a ship into a bridge? Even good stewards have accidents. So if there something better and less destructive to the environment, it should be strongly prefered.