Would that I could. If it were me alone I probably would have left the country years ago. But I have my husband and he is close to his family. They are already unhappy that we don’t live in the same state as them. (My own family are pieces of Trumper Evangelical shit and I don’t speak to them anyway)

Fun design exercise though.

It’s not guaranteed the employer will contribute. Half of them (including mine) do not. It’s simply a tax deferred portfolio in that case.

It’s actually the opposite. When the oxygen binds to the iron it changes from Fe+2 to Fe+3 so the binding of oxygen to the iron in hemoglobin is an oxidation process. At that point it can’t take more oxygen until it releases it in a reduction reaction.

The term “oxidation” is originally derived from reactions where a substance combines with oxygen but has since been generalized to any reaction where an electron is given up. So “oxidation” is the broader term and “oxygenation” is the specific oxidation reaction that results in binding oxygen.

On repeat it was aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Oxidation is how red blood cells collect oxygen to pass to the rest of the body. In fact it is iron in hemoglobin that “rusts” to collect the oxygen. You would die if your blood didn’t “rust”.

Antioxidants have nothing to do with this.

That will never happen. He could come out today saying Black Lives Matter, abortion is a human right, trans people deserve respect, and immigrants are welcome and they would just cheer.

They aren’t following him for his views. They follow him because he is their cult leader.

Slip and do what? Hit the nuclear button this time? He’s “slipped” nearly every day. Nothing changes.

I was today years old when I realized this thing has a name and it is called “Hellmo”.

A cuck.

Just cover it with a pride flag.

Whatever you do, please record it so the rest of us can live vicariously through you.

Does he though?

What gives you the impression Trump cares about how the US looks to the international community?

I’m more surprised that the survey even had that as an option. I think the survey options were just:

• the rich have too much
• the poor have too much
• they have about the same

Kind of a braindead survey tbh and probably doesn’t justify an article.

I mean the literal definition of poor is that they don’t have enough.

6% said “the poor have too much”

wat

I edited my post to include metric units for those numbers.

And sure, it’s fine to say that is short from your own personal perspective but yes statistically the average height was less back then. Even so the average height today is only about 10 cm more.

You may just be taller than average if you are that incredulous about his height. I don’t consider 5’5" (1.68 m) to be that far off from the average height of men in most countries today. If he were under say 5’ (1.52 m) I would say that is significantly shorter.

1.68m is 5’5" which is yeah short but not too far from the (self-reported) average male height in France today which is 5’9" (1.75m) (Bayesian estimates actually say 5’7" (1.70m)). During Bonaparte’s time average male height in France was 5’4" (1.62m) so he was actually taller than average by a tiny bit.

Average height has increased over time.

Put them in the front line on our war with Iran please.