Hi guy

  • 1 Post
  • 106 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle

  • It’s a modernization of fascism.

    It’s still fascism.

    But it’s also so much worse.

    Instead of papers please, it’s drones and facial recognition (palantir/thiel). It’s killbots and robotic cryptids (optimus/mech dogs). It’s ai, algorithms that know you better than you know yourself, disinfo and thought police (Facebook, amazon). It’s tracking and controlling what you can buy and where (crypto [crypto is NOT anonymous]). It’s a return to slavery and/or elimination of human labor in favor of humanoid machines.

    It’s absolute control and obedience (all of the above).






  • Lone wolfs are lone.

    Unorganized chaos v a movement with leadership easily targeted.

    People with nothing left to lose are not just those the public has normally ostracized. They include very intelligent, very motivated people.

    It only takes one person to act.

    Revolution often doesn’t involve the moderate or uninformed.

    When the power elite have no idea from where or when they might be deposed, that could be a much more powerful tool than an uprising easily suppressed by jack boots and tear gas.



  • Just adding to the confusion when that’s already what musk’s site is.

    Jokes aside, probably a little bit, and then a lot.

    Guess we’ll see who has more sway: the folks who think diseases are a hoax, those who only care about profit, or the people doing the science.

    Probably doesnt help when the first group is being funded and fed disinfo by the second group.





  • And I fucking quote myself in my comment above

    distinction between foss and open source.

    You said the comment in which I gave the fucking definition of Foss as written by the people who wrote the very definition of Foss was not foss.

    You just gave me a link within the link that gives the definition of Foss about what Foss isn’t.

    It isn’t me that needs to read better.

    Go away.



  • You said what I posted was not Foss.

    It came from the very essence of Foss.

    It gave the very definition of Foss.

    From the people who started Foss movement .

    On the site run by the people who continue to promote and advocate for Foss.

    And explains the distinction between Foss and open source.

    What about that is unclear?

    Post something else about open souce, please.

    Tell me again how that is not what Foss is.

    Please, guide me.

    (What you cleverly replied with is in the link I posted ffs)