Maybe it should be a rule for this instance that any post about a study must have the proper citation

Fairly certain it’s not lead poisoning

Its unfortunate that the way our brains process ingroup and outgroup perceptions leads to such depravity spilling out of what we’d consider those who are true sociopaths into the thoughts and actions of every day people. The bug in the code of human cognition that is social identity theory is essentially dehumanization, the creation of facism, and genocide.

Yeah, I don’t understand what happens in a person’s brain to not have a default of “invading someone and killing their people is inexcusable”

Well, they never said when Israel went too far, just that they have. You can also be misinformed about a subject and retroactively see they went too far much earlier than you thought.

Its not their content (unless they make originals I dont know) they are just distributing Japanese content

They are mutually exclusive. If someone is telling you to stop someone stabbing them, if you’re response is to finish their passport application that doesn’t solve much

They would prefer an end to the genocide. Telling someone “they exist” doesn’t stop their execution.

Yeah people saying it’s BS because it has a catchy title is pure anti science doomerism

“Overcome the issue of democracy”

I don’t know if I’m stupid or not but I tried going to peertube and I couldn’t for the life of my understand what I was looking at. It just seemed like a vague soup of instances with no continuity or ability to know what I was looking at. Maybe I accessed it wrong but I didn’t fully get it.

They posted the replication crisis and said that its an “art” to know which science is grounded in evidence and which is not.

You’re right, its not solved. It’s not really a problem than can exactly be fully solved and definitely not within the current structure of the journal system and the publish or perish of academia like you mentioned.

Your other post however is the nuance completely missing from what OP said which is that we do already have ways of rooting out consensus and empirical support through the hierarchy of evidence.

I pretty much agree with you, what I was annoyed about is the vague dismissal of what has been done to improve science. It’s not an art to know what is good scientific work, it’s still a science and evidence based policy and action is needed now more than ever.

Also let’s acknowledge that just posting the Wikipedia of the replication crisis and saying that makes scientific theory development invalid is total bullshit.

First that this issue was brought up ~20 years go. Second that the advancement of meta science has remedied these issues a lot. Third that we are now far more open about science with organizations like OSF. Fourth that in the example of the comic these are usually arguments against highly replicated works like climate science not small niche areas of psychology the public doesn’t interact with.

That’s great honey, by the way did you remember to take your medication this morning?

Link errors out when I try to open it

ITT a lot of people with pretty severe mental health issues who really need help if socialization is this detrimental for them

As a non-Israeli Jew I will confirm, I am very very very fucking pissed not just because they have made the world less safe for me but because this poison of national narcissism has used our trauma as a tool of evil. I can’t participate or be near my own culture anymore which was once a deep comfort for me who’s last memories of many of my late loved ones being our shared religious ceremonies. The name of Israel on my lips in prayer now sours the kiddush wine.

Refugees from r/pyongyang finding their way to Lemmy

Depends on the context, there is a lot of work in the scientific methods community trying to use NLP to augment traditionally fully human processes such as thematic analysis and systematic literature reviews and you can have protocols for validation there without 100% human review