

It’s not a competition, and insulting developers who donate their time to open-source is counterproductive.
Use whatever you wish.
He / They
Software Developer
It’s not a competition, and insulting developers who donate their time to open-source is counterproductive.
Use whatever you wish.
Fitting username
I don’t have a degree, so I never peaked 🥳
That sounds so pleasant! Here, you go to Rona / Lowe’s, you ask them a question and you’re met with an “iunnodude”. Maybe home hardware is comparable.
Story time?
So… Proprietary Anubis?
Oh dw you’re good, I couldn’t tell if you were genuinely asking 😅 I don’t know if the cat has an eye missing, but the other one is not visible.
It’s a one-eyed cat looking up with a tilted head
It’s a good starting point, never the final product.
Honestly I’d be happy with a phone sporting two USB C ports, one centered and one off to the side where the headphone jack used to be, both fully functional.
*hippopotamus
Thanks, I had copy-pasted it from the website :)
My interpretation was that AI companies can train on material they are licensed to use, but the courts have deemed that Anthropic pirated this material as they were not licensed to use it.
In other words, if Anthropic bought the physical or digital books, it would be fine so long as their AI couldn’t spit it out verbatim, but they didn’t even do that, i.e. the AI crawler pirated the book.
Gist:
What’s new: The Northern District of California has granted a summary judgment for Anthropic that the training use of the copyrighted books and the print-to-digital format change were both “fair use” (full order below box). However, the court also found that the pirated library copies that Anthropic collected could not be deemed as training copies, and therefore, the use of this material was not “fair”. The court also announced that it will have a trial on the pirated copies and any resulting damages, adding:
“That Anthropic later bought a copy of a book it earlier stole off the internet will not absolve it of liability for the theft but it may affect the extent of statutory damages.”
I will shart a little
“accidentally” leaving an anchor dragging across an intercontinental internet cable would do it
Fingers and toes
Because it’s an OSK, not a touch screen keyboard.
Hopefully someone spends some time developing a proper touch keyboard on GNOME.