My immediate response is “Eh.”
Here, it’s portrayed as a joke in a way that is presented such that the humor is derived from how obviously Bugs is not a woman and is the same rabbit that he’s hunting, and that Elmer is really really dumb for falling for it. I don’t believe that transphobes would decry this depiction, even today, because it aligns with their sensibilities.
I’m not sure what makes it seem recycled, seems like a reasonably fine print to me. I believe it’s printed in PLA which personally I’d want to see PETG but that’s more for long-term durability than microplastic concerns, which I can’t speak to.
That’s it, just a special Easter egg that I would be half surprised if Google even remembers being there.
Fun thing, if you have an android phone and the stock Google phone dialer, try typing that in.
(Note: has to be the Google or AOSP dialer)
And steamed carrots slap.
INSPIRED
bythatsamefrenchexcellence
muah hua haaaaa
I would say under-extrusion would probably make ironing less attractive in this case depending on why there was under-extrusion.Would help, but I think it would still be subpar.
It’s very distinct. I wouldn’t call it vomit, but it’s a lingering chemical-ey taste.
I think I have a mutation in a taste bud or something, but Sucralose is really a prominent and nasty taste to me in anything it’s in. Really frustrating to taste it in otherwise sugary drinks, like some of the Monster flavors.
For reference, I also think cilantro tastes like soap. No clue if that’s an indicator or not.
I really don’t understand the aggression, I was talking about the old rich dead people propaganda concerning no taxation without representation 200 years ago, I never said anything about the fuckwads we have today.
If you think I’m saying something different, explain what you read and allow me the opportunity to clarify my intent.
Saying I’m full of shit at this point is just asinine.
I don’t know, I don’t see anyone saying that here.
That’s possibly reframing “no taxation without representation” a bit but I don’t entirely disagree with the sentiment.
I don’t enjoy the idea of babies given circumcisions, I can’t abide genetic tailoring by a person internationally decried as an unethical practitioner doing things in secret just to stoke his ego to make him the first, bypassing the incredibly necessary ethical safeguards that the industry enforces against themselves.
I don’t want him to be able to do what he did in the way that he did it because the way that he did what he did allows for monstrosities to be committed in the name of advancing science at any cost with no thought to potential lifelong unknowable direct consequences in the people being treated.
I don’t have an anti-genetic editing slant, I don’t think the goal is bad.
Why is this disgraced and denounced genome-editing ethics-lacking guy being spammed so fucking much
First three times I got the wheel it triggered.
I didn’t understand the memes.
Then it never happened again.
“Shit or get out of the kitchen” is my current favorite malaphor.
An ordnance technician at a dead run outranks everybody.
That’s called a sneakernet. Although, if you’re talking actual pigeons, you may be interested in RFC1149.
Oh, that was all my own take from an external observer’s viewpoint.
They would likely just stop at “bugs bunny = good because I like it” and refuse to engage critically past that.