14·
3 months agoArticle got removed ?
- 0 Posts
- 19 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: July 4th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
This is a shit post now ?
691·6 months agoMedia headlines that use the word lobbying probably do it so that people don’t take up arms. If they were to instead call it bribery, I think a lot more people would take issue with the whole process.
It has not been peer reviewed.
I could make a paper in 5 minutes about how AI can be used to uniquely identify people by smelling their farts. Doesn’t mean anything unless it’s been peer reviewed.
Until this paper has been peer reviewed, I give it as much credit as I give a flat earth conspiracy person.
1914·8 months agoI’m not a US citizen, but I can understand why some people didn’t wanna vote this time.
Even though Trump might be worse than Biden when it comes to this conflict, how can anyone vote for Kamala knowing that the death of more innocents will be on their conscience?
Yes honey, I’m almost there.
What an absolutely braindead comment.
Now I fully agree that marital rape should definitely have the same repercussions as rape. However, the summary posted made me think initially that there was no protection for women against domestic violence in India at all.
After some googling, I found some more context
“It is submitted that the act colloquially referred to as ‘marital rape’ ought to be illegal and criminalised. The Central Government asserts that a woman’s consent is not obliterated by marriage, and its violation should result in penal consequences. However, the consequences of such violations within marriage differ from those outside it. Parliament has provided different remedies, including criminal law provisions, to protect consent within marriage. Sections 354, 354A, 354B, 498A IPC, and the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, ensure serious penal consequences for such violations,”
Tl;dr marital rape is illegal and can be prosecuted. But somehow the court thinks that the act of marriage changes the situation.
In my field of research, there seems to be a recent push for artifact evaluation. It’s a separate process which is also optional but you get to brag about the fact that you get badges if your experiment results were replicated.
There’s also some push back against this since it’s additional work, but I think it’s a step in the right direction.
8·1 year agoYou can’t say the quiet part out loud.
Oh we know. We just don’t care.
4·1 year agoI have an entire playlist for this. But the my favorite ones are
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7cuTnbF-2c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-J9FuvPmMoI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbaAxgufFA8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nfziCIMrHs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvfFJGeZH_w
1·1 year agoAnd you’re saying that shouldn’t be the case right ? Right ?
I’d insert that Anakin Padme meme here if I had one ready.
By that logic, nothing is a human right since you can find food, water and shelter in the wild.
The problem with that logic is that you assume everyone to be physically able and knowledgeable to live off the land.
Wait, I thought this was an onion article
I don’t remember where I originally heard this from, but the Serenity Prayer has helped me get through some tough times
“Oh God, give us courage to change what must be altered, serenity to accept what can not be helped, and insight to know the one from the other”
I know it begins with “God”, but I found it applicable to my life without requesting anything from God.
Not an American. But I’ve heard the same explanation. And it does make sense to me.
However, why do Americans say “Fourth of July” then?