Sorry but I’ll never buy the idea of the good man that tried to stop the conspirators within the government and was killed. It is naive and implies that the system - the capitalist USA - is not evil, but it’s just few bad apples that ruin everything. Fuck that. You’d make a nicer impression saying you’re drunk than believing that crap.
As the Commander in Chief, JFK is responsible of all the terrorism the USA did during his presidency. It doesn’t matter if he was the mastermind or an unawere useful idiot.
And BTW this is the kind of lies that JFK said during the Cuban Missile Crisis:
our history, unlike that of the Soviets since the end of World War II, demonstrates that we have no desire to dominate or conquer any other nation or impose our system upon its people
John Fitzgerald “let’s try to invade Cuba” Kennedy tried to stop imperialism? Are you drunk?
China’s need to maintain strong ties with Europe and the U.S.
Nope, it’s the other way around: strong ties with China are convenient to Europe and US, but China don’t need them anymore.
Why? At the end of the day the icj was created by USA to prosecute “dictators” (non-compliant leaders of countries that they want to exploit), and it wasn’t supposed to aim at their allies. This is just housecleaning.
Sorry but I don’t understand the first question. The other thing yeah, it wasn’t good. Anyway I don’t particularly like The Guardian but what is misleading here? People were arrested because UK government kneel to the zionists, the prohibition to get close to the BBC it’s just a silly justification for the arrests.
Thank you, we all agree that the correctness of the news title is more important than people getting fucking arrested because they are exercising their freedom of speech.
These pieces of shit just casually adding “a surge of migrants” to the causes, while the only real cause is greed.
Because they are terrified to find out that the system they live within is the real enemy.
As long as you don’t exploit workers there nothing wrong in having money. You probably know that Engels was rich - and to be honest he did exploit workers (owned a textile factory or something). Was he, by your definition, the kind of person who can be a voice of the people?
You know that you will have to keep paying taxes to the US, right?